All Forums > SimLeague Baseball > MLB > EXCITING ROYALS NEWS RIGHT NOW NOW NOW!!!
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
12/19/2013 7:39 AM
There is a trade going on and we are arguing over cheating. Yow.
12/19/2013 7:08 PM
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 1:28:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 12/19/2013 1:14:00 AM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 12:57:00 AM (view original):
So legal stimulants are ok, even though they are performance enhancing as well? Performance enhancing in your eyes.
There are legal supplements that aid in muscle building. They are legal but steroids aren't. The rules may be arbitrary but they are the rules.

The way I see it, if you get caught breaking them you have to deal with whatever the agreed upon punishment is. But that doesn't disqualify you from the Hall of Fame or prevent you from being considered an all time great.
The legal supplements don't improve eyesight as HGH does or reflexes as steroids do.
I don't think any study has shown that HGH does anything for a healthy young person:  http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mens_Health_Watch/2010/May/growth-hormone-athletic-performance-and-aging

Banned stimulants do increase focus, energy, and endurance.
12/19/2013 7:50 PM
Do stimulants, such as amphetamines, physically transform the human body like steroids and other kinds of PED's can?
12/19/2013 7:55 PM
You certainly don't believe that adding muscle is the only way to illegally enhance performance, do you?
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
12/19/2013 7:58 PM
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 12/19/2013 7:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 1:28:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 12/19/2013 1:14:00 AM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 12:57:00 AM (view original):
So legal stimulants are ok, even though they are performance enhancing as well? Performance enhancing in your eyes.
There are legal supplements that aid in muscle building. They are legal but steroids aren't. The rules may be arbitrary but they are the rules.

The way I see it, if you get caught breaking them you have to deal with whatever the agreed upon punishment is. But that doesn't disqualify you from the Hall of Fame or prevent you from being considered an all time great.
The legal supplements don't improve eyesight as HGH does or reflexes as steroids do.
I don't think any study has shown that HGH does anything for a healthy young person:  http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mens_Health_Watch/2010/May/growth-hormone-athletic-performance-and-aging

Banned stimulants do increase focus, energy, and endurance.
I can pull up a zillion articles that shows it does. Just google it.
I'm guessing they aren't peer reviewed studies on healthy people in the same age group as professional athletes.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
12/19/2013 8:09 PM
Caffeine is a legal stimulant so it isn't banned. And yes, players use a TON of caffeine because it also enhances performance, just to a lesser degree than amphetamines.

If you read the drug agreement you'll see that drugs like weed and heroin are grouped separately as drugs of abuse. Major league players aren't tested for them unless there is probable cause. Amphetamines, on the other hand, are not in that group and players are tested for them in the same way that they are tested for steroids--everyone in spring and then some players randomly throughout the season.
12/19/2013 8:10 PM
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 8:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 12/19/2013 7:58:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 12/19/2013 7:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 1:28:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 12/19/2013 1:14:00 AM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 12/19/2013 12:57:00 AM (view original):
So legal stimulants are ok, even though they are performance enhancing as well? Performance enhancing in your eyes.
There are legal supplements that aid in muscle building. They are legal but steroids aren't. The rules may be arbitrary but they are the rules.

The way I see it, if you get caught breaking them you have to deal with whatever the agreed upon punishment is. But that doesn't disqualify you from the Hall of Fame or prevent you from being considered an all time great.
The legal supplements don't improve eyesight as HGH does or reflexes as steroids do.
I don't think any study has shown that HGH does anything for a healthy young person:  http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mens_Health_Watch/2010/May/growth-hormone-athletic-performance-and-aging

Banned stimulants do increase focus, energy, and endurance.
I can pull up a zillion articles that shows it does. Just google it.
I'm guessing they aren't peer reviewed studies on healthy people in the same age group as professional athletes.
I see nothing about eyesight in you peer reviewed paper. Look it up
I'm not alleging that HGH has any affect on eyesight.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
of 22
All Forums > SimLeague Baseball > MLB > EXCITING ROYALS NEWS RIGHT NOW NOW NOW!!!

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999-2014 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.