MLB: a bag of a**holes. Topic

YOu didn't like Hank's approach?


5/29/2014 12:05 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:01:00 PM (view original):
Home runs (and line drives) are a by-product of a good fundamental swing.  Most major leaguers can take good fundamental swings even with two strikes.
Do players ever miss the ball when they take a good fundamental swing?
Sure.  Do you think they shouldn't?
5/29/2014 12:07 PM
5/29/2014 12:07 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/29/2014 12:07:00 PM (view original):
When I think great hitters, I think Felix Millan.
5/29/2014 12:08 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/29/2014 12:04:00 PM (view original):
It's funny because TW is from a different era when "an out's an out" wasn't an approach to hitting.    Anyone who doesn't see the logic behind his #3 is a proponent of "an out's an out so don't worry about striking out." 

The thing is, TW was a great hitter.   I have no doubt that he could do things that Austin Jackson cannot.   I'm not even sure TW had to apply that approach to hitting to himself.   But, if you don't think it's a good approach, I'm not sure what can convince you that Ted Williams knows more about hitting than you.
Swing hard at pitches you think you can hit hard, including the ones with 2 strikes.  With 2 strikes, also make contact on borderline pitches/good pitches by the pitcher which look like they may be strikes.  That's a good idea, if that's what he meant, that's normal sound baseball.  

If he's saying choke up and put the ball in play, to ignore the opportunity for a long-ball on 2 strikes, I disagree with him.
5/29/2014 12:08 PM
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:01:00 PM (view original):
Home runs (and line drives) are a by-product of a good fundamental swing.  Most major leaguers can take good fundamental swings even with two strikes.
Do players ever miss the ball when they take a good fundamental swing?
Sure.  Do you think they shouldn't?
Shouldn't? Not sure what you're asking.

Of course players will miss the ball sometimes, it's part of the game. Which is why I think it's dumb to focus on strikeouts when talking about an otherwise productive player. If a guy has a good OBP and/or SLG, it doesn't matter how he makes his outs.
5/29/2014 12:09 PM
Posted by burnsy483 on 5/29/2014 12:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/29/2014 12:07:00 PM (view original):
When I think great hitters, I think Felix Millan.
Who said he was a great hitter?
5/29/2014 12:09 PM
I thought choking up like that was something good hitters did.  Sorry.
5/29/2014 12:12 PM
Posted by burnsy483 on 5/29/2014 12:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/29/2014 12:04:00 PM (view original):
It's funny because TW is from a different era when "an out's an out" wasn't an approach to hitting.    Anyone who doesn't see the logic behind his #3 is a proponent of "an out's an out so don't worry about striking out." 

The thing is, TW was a great hitter.   I have no doubt that he could do things that Austin Jackson cannot.   I'm not even sure TW had to apply that approach to hitting to himself.   But, if you don't think it's a good approach, I'm not sure what can convince you that Ted Williams knows more about hitting than you.
Swing hard at pitches you think you can hit hard, including the ones with 2 strikes.  With 2 strikes, also make contact on borderline pitches/good pitches by the pitcher which look like they may be strikes.  That's a good idea, if that's what he meant, that's normal sound baseball.  

If he's saying choke up and put the ball in play, to ignore the opportunity for a long-ball on 2 strikes, I disagree with him.
Uh.......remember this?

"If it's something you can handle and/or are looking for, crush it.    If it's not, just try to get a piece of it.

WOW!!   That's an outrageous request for one of the 400ish best position players in baseball.   Outlandish!!!!!!"
5/29/2014 12:12 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:09:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:01:00 PM (view original):
Home runs (and line drives) are a by-product of a good fundamental swing.  Most major leaguers can take good fundamental swings even with two strikes.
Do players ever miss the ball when they take a good fundamental swing?
Sure.  Do you think they shouldn't?
Shouldn't? Not sure what you're asking.

Of course players will miss the ball sometimes, it's part of the game. Which is why I think it's dumb to focus on strikeouts when talking about an otherwise productive player. If a guy has a good OBP and/or SLG, it doesn't matter how he makes his outs.
What should be the goal of a hitter when he steps into the batters box? 

Try to get a HR / XBH, or try to make solid contact?

Or something else?

5/29/2014 12:13 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:09:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:01:00 PM (view original):
Home runs (and line drives) are a by-product of a good fundamental swing.  Most major leaguers can take good fundamental swings even with two strikes.
Do players ever miss the ball when they take a good fundamental swing?
Sure.  Do you think they shouldn't?
Shouldn't? Not sure what you're asking.

Of course players will miss the ball sometimes, it's part of the game. Which is why I think it's dumb to focus on strikeouts when talking about an otherwise productive player. If a guy has a good OBP and/or SLG, it doesn't matter how he makes his outs.
Would he have a better OBP and or SLG if he cut his strikeouts down by a third and put those balls in play?
5/29/2014 12:13 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/29/2014 12:12:00 PM (view original):
Posted by burnsy483 on 5/29/2014 12:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/29/2014 12:04:00 PM (view original):
It's funny because TW is from a different era when "an out's an out" wasn't an approach to hitting.    Anyone who doesn't see the logic behind his #3 is a proponent of "an out's an out so don't worry about striking out." 

The thing is, TW was a great hitter.   I have no doubt that he could do things that Austin Jackson cannot.   I'm not even sure TW had to apply that approach to hitting to himself.   But, if you don't think it's a good approach, I'm not sure what can convince you that Ted Williams knows more about hitting than you.
Swing hard at pitches you think you can hit hard, including the ones with 2 strikes.  With 2 strikes, also make contact on borderline pitches/good pitches by the pitcher which look like they may be strikes.  That's a good idea, if that's what he meant, that's normal sound baseball.  

If he's saying choke up and put the ball in play, to ignore the opportunity for a long-ball on 2 strikes, I disagree with him.
Uh.......remember this?

"If it's something you can handle and/or are looking for, crush it.    If it's not, just try to get a piece of it.

WOW!!   That's an outrageous request for one of the 400ish best position players in baseball.   Outlandish!!!!!!"
Uh....remember when I agreed with you?
5/29/2014 12:15 PM
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:09:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:01:00 PM (view original):
Home runs (and line drives) are a by-product of a good fundamental swing.  Most major leaguers can take good fundamental swings even with two strikes.
Do players ever miss the ball when they take a good fundamental swing?
Sure.  Do you think they shouldn't?
Shouldn't? Not sure what you're asking.

Of course players will miss the ball sometimes, it's part of the game. Which is why I think it's dumb to focus on strikeouts when talking about an otherwise productive player. If a guy has a good OBP and/or SLG, it doesn't matter how he makes his outs.
What should be the goal of a hitter when he steps into the batters box? 

Try to get a HR / XBH, or try to make solid contact?

Or something else?

Trying to hit a ball hard.
5/29/2014 12:15 PM

Solid contact is hitting a ball hard....right?

5/29/2014 12:16 PM
Posted by The Taint on 5/29/2014 12:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:09:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 5/29/2014 12:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/29/2014 12:01:00 PM (view original):
Home runs (and line drives) are a by-product of a good fundamental swing.  Most major leaguers can take good fundamental swings even with two strikes.
Do players ever miss the ball when they take a good fundamental swing?
Sure.  Do you think they shouldn't?
Shouldn't? Not sure what you're asking.

Of course players will miss the ball sometimes, it's part of the game. Which is why I think it's dumb to focus on strikeouts when talking about an otherwise productive player. If a guy has a good OBP and/or SLG, it doesn't matter how he makes his outs.
Would he have a better OBP and or SLG if he cut his strikeouts down by a third and put those balls in play?
Cutting strikeouts doesn't only affect the plate appearances that ended in a K. All plate appearances would be affected.

I think Generic Major League Player A strikes a balance in his approach between being able to make contact and being able to hit the ball hard. Sliding the scale one way reduces his ability to do the other.
5/29/2014 12:20 PM
◂ Prev 1...38|39|40|41|42...49 Next ▸
MLB: a bag of a**holes. Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.