Posted by tecwrg on 3/17/2015 3:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by burnsy483 on 3/17/2015 2:43:00 PM (view original):
I should use the logic tec has used before when arguing for things that happened in the world I didn't agree with.

"Well, the people who run baseball think he should be banned. Do you think you know better than the people who actually run baseball for a living?"

So you're incapable of independent critical thinking?

That explains why you act like BL's puppy so often.

Thought I'd pick a better master if I were you.

I said I SHOULD use that logic, because you've used it so many times. But I won't, because that's silly.

Oh?

When have I used it?

I'm not going to go back and search through the threads with 87 pages to find it, but you've done it a few times. You can claim I'm full of it, but I'll be satisfied knowing that you likely won't pull that **** again now.

LOL.

You are full of it.

Carry on.

Posted by tecwrg on 1/6/2015 11:50:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 1/6/2015 11:34:00 AM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 1/6/2015 10:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 1/6/2015 8:49:00 AM (view original):
If Smoltz is a no brainier, then Schilling and Mussina are also no brainers. Noble would know that if he looked.

We'll see how many voters agree with you and how many agree with Noble when it's all announced this afternoon.

Oh, I don't think there's any doubt that the voters will put in Smoltz and leave out Schilling and Mussina. But if we look at the numbers...

        IP       ERA+       ERA        Whip         K          WAR
A  3261     127         3.46         1.14      3116          81
B  3473     125         3.33         1.18      3084          67
C  4413     118         3.54         1.31      2607          74
D  3562     123         3.68         1.19      2813          83

It's hard to argue that one of those guys should be in without arguing that all should be in. 

So what you're saying is that YOU are somehow smarter, more knowledgeable, and have more insight into the game of baseball than the people who cover it for a living?

That's a yes or no question.

...

Cheating is cheating. Screw all 3 of them.

Posted by bad_luck on 3/17/2015 4:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 1/6/2015 11:50:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 1/6/2015 11:34:00 AM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 1/6/2015 10:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 1/6/2015 8:49:00 AM (view original):
If Smoltz is a no brainier, then Schilling and Mussina are also no brainers. Noble would know that if he looked.

We'll see how many voters agree with you and how many agree with Noble when it's all announced this afternoon.

Oh, I don't think there's any doubt that the voters will put in Smoltz and leave out Schilling and Mussina. But if we look at the numbers...

        IP       ERA+       ERA        Whip         K          WAR
A  3261     127         3.46         1.14      3116          81
B  3473     125         3.33         1.18      3084          67
C  4413     118         3.54         1.31      2607          74
D  3562     123         3.68         1.19      2813          83

It's hard to argue that one of those guys should be in without arguing that all should be in. 

So what you're saying is that YOU are somehow smarter, more knowledgeable, and have more insight into the game of baseball than the people who cover it for a living?

That's a yes or no question.

...

LOL.

You dumb.

I mean it's pretty much exactly what burns accused you of doing. You call names but you don't deny it.

Does that post say or imply that I blindly adhere to the opinions of so-called "experts"?

Does it say or imply that I am somehow "smarter" than so-called experts?

Does it say anything at all about me?

Your insistence on reading things that are not being said into what was actually said is incredibly stupid.

Posted by tecwrg on 3/17/2015 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Does that post say or imply that I blindly adhere to the opinions of so-called "experts"?

Does it say or imply that I am somehow "smarter" than so-called experts?

Does it say anything at all about me?

Your insistence on reading things that are not being said into what was actually said is incredibly stupid.

Here's what burnsy accused you of saying in the past:

"Well, the people who run baseball think he should be banned. Do you think you know better than the people who actually run baseball for a living?"

You implied that you hadn't said that.

Here's just one example of what you have said in the past:

So what you're saying is that YOU are somehow smarter, more knowledgeable, and have more insight into the game of baseball than the people who cover it for a living?

Regarding your three questions above, I think you're the one reading into things not being said, Mr. Sensitive. It must be all that sand in your vagina.

LOL.

Your desperate need to find a "gotcha" moment exposes your lack of simple comprehension skills.

It's sad, but in a funny way, because it's you.

Um, ok.

There's no gotcha moment.

Burnsy made a joke about your well known tendency to fall back on an appeal to authority. You said, "when have I done that?"

I provided a recent example. That's it.

I'm starting to think you're the one with the massive comprehension shortfall.

Uh, sure.

The example you provided was a comment about you.  Not about me.

Dumbass.

Why do you continue to post in the forums?  We all know how big of a moron you are.  No need to keep proving that point.  You're preaching to the choir.

Wow, Tec doesn't even realize how stupid he looks not accepting the obvious parallel between the 2 posts in question.

Best option when you get called out like that is to just shut up and disappear from the thread for a couple of days.  Or admit it.  Trying to claim that those are different types of posts is absurd.

Posted by tecwrg on 3/17/2015 7:17:00 PM (view original):
Uh, sure.

The example you provided was a comment about you.  Not about me.

Dumbass.

Why do you continue to post in the forums?  We all know how big of a moron you are.  No need to keep proving that point.  You're preaching to the choir.

Yikes.