SUCK IT, PATSIES!! Topic

If you ignore visual evidence of him showcasing his skills, then yes, you are ignoring something.

If you dismiss statistics describing him making big plays under pressure, then you are ignoring something.

If you describe how bad he is in bad weather, and are shown stats that show he might be the best QB ever in bad weather, and dismiss it, you are ignoring something.

I also described instances when he made big plays, under pressure, in big situations.  You ignored it.  In fact, you took a portion of my post and replied to it, while ignoring the other parts.

Are we done now?
3/14/2013 3:41 PM
Posted by bistiza on 3/14/2013 3:38:00 PM (view original):
I didn't ignore anything.

You and everyone else ignored my request to provide a single shred of evidence of the skills you claim Brady has.

Um....they've responded to your requests with video evidence!  What MORE proof do you need?  Actually video!  I mean, if this were  a murder trial, and they showed a video of the defendant stabbing the victim....i'd bet that they find him guilty. 

Well...unless if bis was in the jury.
3/14/2013 4:03 PM
Bis is a moking troll, plain and simple. "Didn't see anything! Show me more!" while he has his fingers in his ears and his eyes shut
3/14/2013 7:28 PM
Make Manning work with only TEs and a slot man and he'd put up worse numbers than Brady.

This is so absurd it's almost not worth addressing, but I will just for the sake of saying I didn't ignore it.

Give Manning Gronk, Hernandez AND Welker and he destroys Brady's numbers no matter who the other wideouts are. No question.

But I'm not discussing Manning - I'm discussing Brady and his lack of skills compared with just about anyone else considered "great".
If you ignore visual evidence of him showcasing his skills, then yes, you are ignoring something.
No, I'm not. I just don't click on links to videos, period.

So I ask for descriptions instead, and YOU ignore that. It's on you to provide evidence other than a video you know I won't see.
If you dismiss statistics describing him making big plays under pressure, then you are ignoring something.

Statistics don't describe a big play under pressure.

The statistics you gave on that were dubious to begin with (what constitutes "under pressure" from the perspective of the person who gave the statistic?) and don't actually describe any plays and lists the skills allegedly shown.
If you describe how bad he is in bad weather, and are shown stats that show he might be the best QB ever in bad weather, and dismiss it, you are ignoring something.

I didn't dismiss it; I systematically debunked the very notion he's a great bad weather QB by showing how the statistic given was misleading. Apparently you ignored that.
I also described instances when he made big plays, under pressure, in big situations.  You ignored it.  In fact, you took a portion of my post and replied to it, while ignoring the other parts.
Now you're delusional. You never did any such thing. I'm still waiting on anyone to provide a description of a single example - if you claim you'd already done it, then go quote it and show me it again. I'm guessing you only did it in your own mind.
Um....they've responded to your requests with video evidence!  What MORE proof do you need?  Actually video!
Again, I've stated several times I do not click on video links and have asked for a description in lieu of video. It wouldn't be difficult to provide a description of the play you see on video if such a play actually showed what you claim it shows. Yet you keep saying you've posted a video when you know I haven't and won't watch it, as though it somehow means something.

VIDEO MEANS NOTHING. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OR YOU HAVE NOTHING.
 I mean, if this were  a murder trial, and they showed a video of the defendant stabbing the victim....i'd bet that they find him guilty.
If it was declared the jury wasn't allowed to watch the video, it would mean nothing. That's essentially the case here if you can follow your own metaphor.

Again:

VIDEO MEANS NOTHING. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OR YOU HAVE NOTHING.


3/15/2013 8:43 AM
Actually video covers everything, but your ostrich like defense mechanism refuses to acknowledge that.


You're not the judge here, you're just another member of the jury. You don't get to decide which evidence is admissible and which isn't.
3/15/2013 9:15 AM
Well, the fact that everyone else is catering to his whims in an attempt to convince him to change his opinion, I'd say he's the judge.

And that those who are continuing to argue about it are kinda dumb.
3/15/2013 9:17 AM
Seriously, there's an 80+ page thread with one user saying "Brady sucks" and 8-10 dumbasses saying "Nuh-uhn and here's why!".

Retarded. 
3/15/2013 9:22 AM
Goes back to that whole bored thing.  How much time do we spend on this website?  All of us are kinda dumb.
3/15/2013 9:23 AM
And it spreads into every ******* thread in the NFL forum.

biz is the......


3/15/2013 9:24 AM
You should go back and reread that socialism thread.
3/15/2013 9:26 AM
Except Bad Luck is the:





3/15/2013 9:27 AM
I could but I already waste too much time on this site.  Which, as you say, makes me kinda dumb.

But, if you want, refresh me on the socialism thread.   They all get jumbled together.   Unlike this forum where I can click any thread and find half a dozen users attempting to "prove" that Brady doesn't suck to biz.
3/15/2013 9:30 AM
I'm not sure, I just know he's got you keeping track of what time he posts. 
3/15/2013 9:33 AM
The guy who's in an argument about the appropriate time and place to post in the forums is telling us we're dumb for arguing something related to sports.
3/15/2013 9:36 AM
Biz -

"I'm not ignoring your visual evidence, I'm just ignoring your visual evidence."

Okey dokey.
3/15/2013 9:38 AM
◂ Prev 1...3|4|5|6|7...23 Next ▸
SUCK IT, PATSIES!! Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.