You guys have anything that annoys you about HD...nothing big, but just little nuances that you would like to see changed?

For example, I cannot stand when I read highlights that say something like 'Trinity loses going away, 80-108'. As we all know, the WINNING score goes first! UGH!

I don't mind it in print to be honest, but I too can't stand when people say the lower score first..."it's 7 to 21"  *nails on a chalkboard* lol

the lack of use in the news feed is incredible, do small things like "Northwood locks up the #1 seed in the conference tournament" Or even "Northwood recieves an NT birth with the #16 seed in the midwest region" So much more can be used in the conference feed.

EDIT also the fact that national championships is not listed on the coaches resume as a number on the left side

Unless I'm mistaken the only way to address a player who is complaining about playing time is play them more. I'd like to be able to bench them for complaining or put all their practice time on conditioning and that "adjust their attitude." Also not being able to respond to their complaining emails is annoying.

Bugs me slightly when some refer to recruiting as "drafting"....

I wish there was another category for recruiting preferences. I like to group my prospects as PG=high priority; SG= medium priority;  SF= low priority. That leaves me no place to put my PF/C.    I reserve the 'not set' group for players that are already in my division and don't have to drop down. 
  I end up putting the PG and SGs together but another category would be cool

Sending my assistant coach out on a weekend scouting trip with the department credit card and getting three reports on the point guard's shot blocking skills and none on his ball handling abilities. Plus a hell of a bar tab. I mean, the guy tried to blackmail me for my job with incriminating photos after my national championship. Can't I just have a token rage button to fire him and the computer picks some other random name out of the phone book to be my "new" assistant coach? 

Posted by colonels19 on 12/20/2014 10:59:00 PM (view original):
I don't mind it in print to be honest, but I too can't stand when people say the lower score first..."it's 7 to 21"  *nails on a chalkboard* lol

Overseas, it signals where the game was played-- whether the visitor or the home team won, without you having to ask. 

I would like to see you be able to rank recruits' priorities on a 1-10 scale. PG may be my most urgent need, but within that group, I may have 3 guys I am looking at...I's like to prioritize them as a 9, 8, and 6, for example,

Posted by eflhoca on 12/21/2014 7:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by colonels19 on 12/20/2014 10:59:00 PM (view original):
I don't mind it in print to be honest, but I too can't stand when people say the lower score first..."it's 7 to 21"  *nails on a chalkboard* lol

Overseas, it signals where the game was played-- whether the visitor or the home team won, without you having to ask. 

i prefer this method too

Study hall. Not saying eliminate it but everyone's goal is to use the minimum minutes possible so just auto set it to that minute value. The randomness associated with it right now Is annoying.

not having a drop down menu for sending multiple campus visits.

Posted by toysboys on 12/22/2014 10:44:00 PM (view original):
not having a drop down menu for sending multiple campus visits.

+1

No way to get a WOTS for international recruits. Since there's no way to buy FSS for them why not have that info at least available.