Veteran Owners Who Co-Coach Other Teams... Topic

Posted by gillispie1 on 1/18/2016 5:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by nachopuzzle on 1/18/2016 1:18:00 PM (view original):
Posted by gillispie1 on 1/18/2016 9:06:00 AM (view original):
i started co-coaching a couple years back, as a way to sort of get back into the game, when i wasn't sure i could handle a team of my own. it was great, it let me get involved when i wanted to, but if i was busy or burnt out, the other coach was there. between the two of us, it was always easy to cover everything. i actually really enjoy it, its pretty fun, to go through it all with someone else. one of the 3, we sort of split the duties, the other 2, we do things together. the latter is definitely better, IMO.

here are the teams i co-coach:
florida state with storm69 in knight
michigan state with dacj501 in rupp
maryland with jjwarden in, i don't know, some 1/day world. its the only world he plays in though.

i always have announced the situation when joining with a coach or when we move to a new conference, so at least the conference folks would realize it. i will sometimes post on those accounts with (CBG) before my post so people know when its me. seems to work out pretty well. i do agree with taniajane, i don't think there are a lot of co-coaches, i only know of a few outside of the ones i am involved in. i wouldn't worry about it too much. i suspect most folks are open about the co-coaching agreements, there's really no reason not to be.
I feel like this is a HUGE fight that we've had plenty of times before...just repackaged under a slightly different premise than previously. Just to get out the old personal **** off the top, it's really telling that billy frames this scenario "as if it's no big deal" almost exactly the same way he did the last time. Now, as for why many people could see this as a big deal is because they are not elite coaches and the prospect of having to compete against not only one elite coach but two in the same team in the same world is very daunting (if not downright unfair to them), and which could go equally as well for accomplished coaches in the same world.

The argument that it happens so infrequently (which is not a positive or factual statement to say the least) is not a argument that it is still fair or within the guidelines of WIS.

...don't plan on fighting this good fight myself, just didn't want this to float through unchecked.
i guess i don't see the two being related at all. two teams per world, there is a clear collusion risk. two coaches per team has no such collusion risk, its still one team, one set of resources. 

as always, our disagreement centers around the fact that this is a for-fun game, not a for-profit game like poker (with meaningful stakes). its fun to co-coach a team with someone. thats the driver. why put a stop to that? you have to have a good reason, or else you are just being a grouch. i decided to try co-coaching because others told me stories about it, and it sounded like a lot of fun. it didn't sound unfair or a way to get ahead, it sounded fun.

without getting into specifics, its probably worth a cursory mention that i am involved with 4 BCS programs. three of those i co-coach, and are the three least successful. yet, i definitely would not say the enjoyment of those programs has tracked the success, as it usually does. the least successful program of that bunch may have been the most fun, i think its close really, but its a contender. long story short, you are suggesting there's a problem because co-coaching may correlate to higher success; its demonstrably not the case in my limited experience, and doesn't seem to be in the stories i am familiar with, but what i HAVE seen, is a correlation with enjoyment. no reason to start a battle against fun...
Yeah, if my post was misleading, I apologize, and I could have phrased it better. I wasn't relating this situation in any way with that of collusion, I was simply making a statement about competitive advantage. Just as a team with one human coach only has one allotment of resources such as personal time, previous experience, etc, etc., it follows that a team with two coaches will inherently have more resources at their disposal, therefore though both of the teams may 'have' the same set of resources they don't truly 'have' the same amount.

Our current definition (at the least the perceived definition in my head based on years of forum activity) of fairness doesn't explicitly address or quantify these resources and how they impact the likelihood of success in the game. Which is what I think this thread is about, no??? If the trajectory of this thread isn't following the intended path then I'm sure we can find a way to get it going in the right direction.

As far as what I said about WIS guidelines (which in reality is what I think made my statement come of much worse that what I was really saying), what I meant is that as far as I know there is no positive statement either way about this issue...and the lack of a stance isn't the same thing as an open endorsement. If I'm wrong about this then I apologize for my ignorance, and even then it is still worth while to have these conversations from time to time.
1/19/2016 1:07 PM
Posted by nachopuzzle on 1/19/2016 12:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by nachopuzzle on 1/18/2016 12:45:00 PM (view original):
Posted by therewas47 on 1/18/2016 11:02:00 AM (view original):
Is it considered co-coaching if you have two people who share 1 account and don't have any other accounts? My best friend and I have been doing this for years. It's a great way to get everything done even if one of us is gone for a weekend or something.
the only thing worse than a tattle tell is someone preemptively and needlessly outing themselves in order to unjustly gain some form of undue moral superiority....as far as i see it, two people working together with one account in real life is way worse than six people working together with nine accounts through the site...in my humble opinion.
I just wanted to state that this previous post by me was made with the attempt of mild humor and mild trolling at the expensive of therewas. And understood in this context it might shed some light on the reply to billyg directly after it.
shut it nacho. We all know you're a militant fascist and npb is an impractical socialist (sarcasm)
1/19/2016 1:19 PM
I cannot imagine any valid argument to ban or disclose mentoring - so long as the mentoring does not go so far as to involve impermissible sharing of FSS information or the like.

To me, mentoring implies teams at different levels - if someone said he was mentoring a coach at another school in his conference, it would be troubling - but that isnt typical mentoring.

I see no issue in two people sharing a team - so long as they dont otherwise share info in forbidden ways for other teams etc.  Take an extreme case - an adult and a young teen son.  Lets say that dad helps now and then.  Assume no other teams in HD.  Now, it may be that in one game the game plan is made by a 14 year old and in the next it is made by an adult.  The game plans differ.  One or the other may be wiser.  No one is entitled to know who made the game plan.

What if a coach sometimes game plans and sometimes is too busy, even leaves the prior game plan in effect.  That could be a big difference.  What if a coach sometimes game plans after several drinks?  And sometimes doesnt?

A lot of the whining in this thread is even more whiny than stuff I have seen in the past.  Kudos on exploring new territory in ways to discover unfairness.



1/19/2016 1:24 PM
"my mentor can beat your mentor!"


1/19/2016 1:25 PM
This thread (that I started) was supposed to be focused on co-coaching, what was involved in it exactly, and it branched off into mentoring halfway through as well.

I had always been led to believe (in old forum threads) that co-coaching (and mentoring) involved a formal, thorough arrangement where a veteran coach took an owner under his wing, and walked him day to day through a full season of HD... from each phase and window of recruiting, to roster building, to game planning, really everything thoroughly. Nothing illegal, all well within the rules.

After several seasons, the mentor-mentee would part ways. This is the arrangement that I thought warranted the need to list the mentor-mentee (I may be wrong on this, fine), because I might be reluctant (and I may be wrong on this too, fine) to take on a team in a recruiting battle that has an HD legend like gillispie (or whomever) helping to guide them. Again, this proposal got little to no support, so fine, no worries.

After reading the answers on this thread, apparently I was mistaken on the extent of guidance that a co-coach or mentor provides to his student. This is fine, I may have misinterpreted old threads from years past. Again, the intent of this thread was to better understand what it entails.

Anyway, that was the background of my question. Some in the thread misinterpreted some of the things I had asked, assumed I was on a witch hunt, assumed a lot of things, and it became a circus. At a certain point I realized that I would gain nothing from constant bantering in the thread, so I bailed out.

To be clear, I never accused anyone of cheating. I never said co-coaching is cheating. I never said mentoring is cheating. I also never said poaching is cheating, although I've never done it. I basically just asked for clarification on a topic, thought it might warrant discussion, and was labeled as a paranoid or whatever.

But let me be clear:
- I asked for the definition of a co-coach and mentor, what each entails.
- I brought forth the idea that co-coaches or mentors-mentees let us know who they are. This has little to no support, so fine, no worries.
- I never, not once, said that any of this is cheating. Co-coaching isn't cheating. Mentoring isn't cheating. Poaching isn't cheating, although I've never done it.
- I never asked that sitemail guidance be shared with everyone. Someone misinterpreted what I said.

That's it. Again, several posters jumped on me early and assumed I had taken out a pitchfork and a tinfoil hat. They also created strawmen and then flamed me. Ok. Many of you might know me generally from time in Crum, and should know I'm not a troublemaker, but I do try to understand the game better.

The following was not intended to be part of this thread, but I will include it as a side note:
This is cheating:
- Owners who buy Div-1 schools under one of their multiple names, and stay there 1 year with no intention of developing the team, to use the Div-1 school's money to buy and feed FSS information to their Div-2 schools.
.
1/19/2016 2:39 PM (edited)
Agree fully that that hypo is cheating

I think there are a wide range of mentoring arrangements.  I have never been a formal "mentor" like having an agreement with someone, but there are new coaches whose questions I have tried my best to answer.

Good luck.

1/19/2016 3:45 PM
Posted by CoachSpud on 1/18/2016 10:13:00 PM (view original):
"Can someone expain how The Firm works?"

npb7768, I do not think you will be told things like this. Even as a newbie I am aware that (as you can readily tell from this and other threads), HD seems to have a murky layer of multiple identities, multiple teams, convoluted relationships, sharing of information and teams and a long history of other sub rosa interactions between and among veteran coaches.  For example, there are conferences in which the coaches agree, overtly or not, not to compete with one another for recruits.  FSS information may be shared by some.  If  you push for information you will be ridiculed and mocked (this thread is an example) and not enjoy the game, so it is best to leave it.  Better to enjoy the game as it was intended and just ignore the underworld in it.  In this regard it is no different from most online games.
i think there is a bit of a murky layer, but its not as broad as you describe. the true murky layer is folks who use multiple teams in a world to share FSS info with themselves, or worse, who exchange recruiting intentions with rival coaches. there's definitely a good bit of both of those, i think it would be naive to suggest otherwise.

however, the vast majority of folks, veterans and otherwise, are openly and completely against those things. that is cheating, plain and simple. those kinds of collusion are definitely not a "veteran coach" thing. also, i don't know of any conference anywhere, where the veteran coaches get together to agree not to compete. now, poaching is a sensitive topic, and has been for as long as i can remember. poaching a conference mate, when people want to have that close-knit conference feel, and when you all benefit from the success of the conference, many folks feel in-conference poaching is not really kosher. today's competitive climate has forced the issue, and opened that door some, but years ago, virtually nobody anywhere was poaching in conference. it wasn't groups of veterans doing it to beat up on noobies, it was everyone doing it. the conferences you are referring to, i simply don't think exist.

there has been this undercurrent, for a while - and i think d1 splitting into the haves and have-nots has been a big part of it - that veterans are responsible for everything wrong in this game. you get poached because veterans are dicks. PIT bids have no limit because veterans are selfish and want the bonus money for themselves. the only reason anyone would ever be against turning d1 into d2/d3 is because they coach an A+ school and want to keep that advantage for themselves. its genuine 100% bullshit. as a community, we clearly don't hold that much power over the course of the game. the reality is, virtually everyone agrees - d1 is broken - its got to be fixed - its just that the veterans figured this out 5 years ago, and some of you newer folks are just figuring it out now. so, yeah, we see things differently, in terms of solutions, that is natural, given some very different contexts that we have. some folks are new, some have been here over 10 years, and lived through numerous game updates. of course we see the answers differently. but we all have the same goal. trying to make it an us-vs-them thing, its not going to get anyone anywhere.

1/19/2016 6:03 PM
It has come to my attention that part of my earlier post is poorly written and easily misunderstood.  My bad.

I wrote, "If you push for information you will be ridiculed and mocked (this thread is an example) and not enjoy the game, so it is best to leave it. Better to enjoy the game as it was intended and just ignore the underworld in it. In this regard it is no different from most online games."

I meant leave the criticism alone, ignore it, forget it.  I did not mean leave the game.  I think "Better to enjoy the game as it was intended and just ignore the underworld in it" makes my intention clearer.

Sorry about any confusion.
1/19/2016 8:53 PM
Posted by npb7768 on 1/18/2016 10:13:00 PM (view original):
You guys are awesome. I ask several simple questions, you blow them out of proportion and act like a bunch of d-bags. And nobody has explained what "The Firm" is.
npb7768,

Thank you for your interest in TheFirm. We have reviewed your resume, and it will remain in our records for 6 months. We will gladly reach out to you when we believe there is an opening that fits your talents.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Best Regards,
jetwildcat
Founder of TheFirm

Since its inception in 2013, TheFirm is an industry-leading simulated basketball talent development organization. Currently stationed at BYU in Wooden, TheFirm has amassed 398 wins and 1 national title through only 519 games.
1/19/2016 9:46 PM
Posted by CoachSpud on 1/19/2016 8:53:00 PM (view original):
It has come to my attention that part of my earlier post is poorly written and easily misunderstood.  My bad.

I wrote, "If you push for information you will be ridiculed and mocked (this thread is an example) and not enjoy the game, so it is best to leave it. Better to enjoy the game as it was intended and just ignore the underworld in it. In this regard it is no different from most online games."

I meant leave the criticism alone, ignore it, forget it.  I did not mean leave the game.  I think "Better to enjoy the game as it was intended and just ignore the underworld in it" makes my intention clearer.

Sorry about any confusion.
CoachSpud,

Thank you for your interest in an Underworld Intelligence Operative position with TheFirm. We will contact you if we believe you are a fit for the position.

Feel free to reach out to me with any questions.

Best Regards,
jetwildcat
Founder of TheFirm

Since its inception in 2013, TheFirm is an industry-leading simulated basketball talent development organization. Currently stationed at BYU in Wooden, TheFirm has amassed 398 wins and 1 national title through only 519 games.
1/19/2016 9:49 PM
Posted by dacj501 on 1/18/2016 2:13:00 PM (view original):
makes me wonder why I ever bother showing posts from people I've blocked...probably a reason I blocked them in the first place...
Hey, I hope you didn't reblock me, brah...because I want you to know that when I referenced "eliteness", it wasn't directed at you.
1/19/2016 11:47 PM
Posted by nachopuzzle on 1/19/2016 11:47:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dacj501 on 1/18/2016 2:13:00 PM (view original):
makes me wonder why I ever bother showing posts from people I've blocked...probably a reason I blocked them in the first place...
Hey, I hope you didn't reblock me, brah...because I want you to know that when I referenced "eliteness", it wasn't directed at you.

1/20/2016 8:43 AM
◂ Prev 12345
Veteran Owners Who Co-Coach Other Teams... Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.