Posted by zhawks on 2/12/2017 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Posted by CoachSpud on 2/12/2017 12:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by zhawks on 2/12/2017 12:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by CoachSpud on 2/12/2017 12:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by zhawks on 2/12/2017 11:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by CoachSpud on 2/12/2017 11:47:00 AM (view original):
| xxx |
xxx |
DI |
C |
VH |
Yes |
39% |
|
| xxx |
xxx |
DI |
B+ |
VH |
Yes |
29% |
<< Signed |
| xxx |
xxx |
DI |
B- |
VH |
Yes |
32% |
|
What is this? An example of...?
Well ... the topic of the thread is VH vs VH vs VH. That's a clue.
One single example with no context is fairly worthless. You have to look at a much larger population.
Duh! Here is a pure data point. If that goes over your head, I'm sorry. (If you get that, explain it to poor zorzii). Have you noticed that most of what passes for "a much larger population" in these threads is either selectively chosen, too small to draw the conclusions that are attempted, or grossly corrupted in ways too numerous to list?
If you're only sharing your occurrences of vh vh vh or even just a few coaches... even if you had teams in every world it would still be too small of a sample size. You've got to pull it all to actually make conclusions.
Yes, I am aware of the problem of small sample size. However, each example has potential use. For example, you could reliably begin to flesh out the margins, where the possibilities begin and end. For example, we know that in a VH-VH-VH battle, one team could be as strong as 39% likely to sign and another could be as weak as 29% likely to sign. Another example might move those extremes. A lot more can be learned from concrete examples than from all the speculation on the forums.