All Forums > SimLeague Basketball > Theme Leagues > DDL#3 - 1990's Draft (league#46043)
10/4/2013 9:40 PM
Posted by scudmissle on 10/4/2013 9:15:00 PM (view original):
actually, both arguments (tang's and the others) have merit... i kind of side with tang on this issue, but only by a .005%. if in a perfect world, the 3rd round should start at number 12 (that's me! haha), then 11 picks, then 13, then 10, then 14, then 9, etc. (can imagine how that would end up being a clusterf'k), but we do not live, nor draft, in a perfect world, and the draft style was clearly stated from the beginning, so, there should be no discrepancy at this stage of the game.

though perhaps there is a (very) slight disadvantage witht the current serpentine style, tang, you, nonetheless, are a clever owner, so just look at it as a great opportunity to showcase your drafting abilities.

thanks, for the .005% confidence! and I am giving a warning I do not want a complaint once a deployed my strategy! now, wtf I am going to deal with that (beep) monster DH is building over there
10/5/2013 12:18 PM (edited)
NOTICE - off-the-clock draft this weekend.

10/4/13 Fri.
EDT
9:00 cmcafeeky - Kevin Johnson
10:00 badja - Larry Bird
11:00 steelers - Buck Williams

12:00 kdforester - Dana Barros
1:00 rubnsly - Tim Hardaway
2:00 dskantor - Reggie Miller
3:00 smokey - Vince Carter
4:00 skypilot - Kobe Bryant
5:00 tanguma - Antonio McDyess
6:00 longtallbrad - Mitch Richmond    
7:00 seapilots - Clarence Weatherspoon       (pg1 updated)
round3
8:00 thomcat - Vlade Divac

10/7/13 Mon.
9:00 malone - Mark Jackson
10:00 98average - Gheorghe Muresan
11:00 carbonjones - Vin Baker
12:00 eleibowitz
1:00 natenoy
2:00 dh555
3:00 jhsukow
4:00 benjihall
5:00 jkaye
6:00 kacyon
7:00 scudmissle
8:00 cmcafeeky


DDL #2..the 70's - Finals: ApocalypseNow / dh555 (3)   -vs-    Monty Pythons HG / cmac (3)
 
10/4/2013 10:26 PM
I've sm'ed 98 & cj.
10/4/2013 10:35 PM
tang, you and I are in the same boat, we pick 3rd & 5th, from my side of the boat the draft looks as fair as possible. Let's face it, you and I caught the luck. Karma will remember if we complain about having our ball'z in a solid gold vise. I think we'll be ok..... 
10/4/2013 10:48 PM
sky, I was wrong..we made it though the 2nd round before members started to lose their ****....(I can't stop lmao). Looks like I'll be buying lunch again....Mickey D's.
10/4/2013 11:18 PM
Posted by tanguma44 on 10/4/2013 9:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by scudmissle on 10/4/2013 9:15:00 PM (view original):
actually, both arguments (tang's and the others) have merit... i kind of side with tang on this issue, but only by a .005%. if in a perfect world, the 3rd round should start at number 12 (that's me! haha), then 11 picks, then 13, then 10, then 14, then 9, etc. (can imagine how that would end up being a clusterf'k), but we do not live, nor draft, in a perfect world, and the draft style was clearly stated from the beginning, so, there should be no discrepancy at this stage of the game.

though perhaps there is a (very) slight disadvantage witht the current serpentine style, tang, you, nonetheless, are a clever owner, so just look at it as a great opportunity to showcase your drafting abilities.

thanks, for the .005% confidence! and I am giving a warning I do not want a complaint once a deployed my strategy! now, wtf I am going to deal with that (beep) monster DH is building over there
is the (beep) for the word foul?

curious to know why you think kemp/oakley is better than jordan/mcdyess?

and im more than willing to trade teams....id love to unleash jordan on this league

10/5/2013 2:14 AM
Posted by smokey57 on 10/4/2013 10:35:00 PM (view original):
tang, you and I are in the same boat, we pick 3rd & 5th, from my side of the boat the draft looks as fair as possible. Let's face it, you and I caught the luck. Karma will remember if we complain about having our ball'z in a solid gold vise. I think we'll be ok..... 
translation: I didn't realized it till this was brought just, now! Heck, I even got a top pick myself as far as being okay... yeah 30 wins it's okay (note to self: well may be 35+ got Carter to pair mailman that's not that bad, yet)
10/5/2013 2:22 AM
Posted by dh555 on 10/4/2013 11:18:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tanguma44 on 10/4/2013 9:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by scudmissle on 10/4/2013 9:15:00 PM (view original):
actually, both arguments (tang's and the others) have merit... i kind of side with tang on this issue, but only by a .005%. if in a perfect world, the 3rd round should start at number 12 (that's me! haha), then 11 picks, then 13, then 10, then 14, then 9, etc. (can imagine how that would end up being a clusterf'k), but we do not live, nor draft, in a perfect world, and the draft style was clearly stated from the beginning, so, there should be no discrepancy at this stage of the game.

though perhaps there is a (very) slight disadvantage witht the current serpentine style, tang, you, nonetheless, are a clever owner, so just look at it as a great opportunity to showcase your drafting abilities.

thanks, for the .005% confidence! and I am giving a warning I do not want a complaint once a deployed my strategy! now, wtf I am going to deal with that (beep) monster DH is building over there
is the (beep) for the word foul?

curious to know why you think kemp/oakley is better than jordan/mcdyess?

and im more than willing to trade teams....id love to unleash jordan on this league

yeah, I am sure you would love to unleash Jordan, but after looking what you did with him in the ppl? he send you a "no, thank you!" note by the way, do you plan in screwing your next pick to erase that big smile you probably have!
10/5/2013 3:32 AM

Gheorghe Muresan

10/5/2013 10:02 AM
Posted by tanguma44 on 10/4/2013 9:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by scudmissle on 10/4/2013 9:15:00 PM (view original):
actually, both arguments (tang's and the others) have merit... i kind of side with tang on this issue, but only by a .005%. if in a perfect world, the 3rd round should start at number 12 (that's me! haha), then 11 picks, then 13, then 10, then 14, then 9, etc. (can imagine how that would end up being a clusterf'k), but we do not live, nor draft, in a perfect world, and the draft style was clearly stated from the beginning, so, there should be no discrepancy at this stage of the game.

though perhaps there is a (very) slight disadvantage witht the current serpentine style, tang, you, nonetheless, are a clever owner, so just look at it as a great opportunity to showcase your drafting abilities.

thanks, for the .005% confidence! and I am giving a warning I do not want a complaint once a deployed my strategy! now, wtf I am going to deal with that (beep) monster DH is building over there
"Deploy my strategy" in other words, overplaying and tanking games.  This guy is the biggest joke.  


10/5/2013 10:11 AM
There will be complaints. Willing to bet tang won't be in the next DDL, tanking is bad for the game
10/5/2013 11:51 AM
I note that about 20 or so members aren't saying much, this makes me think that 21 owners are good with the situation in the DDL draft. I love the draft, I also understand that some members have families and if my memory serves me right that means a busy weekend having fun. I proposed we take the weekend off for their benefit.
10/5/2013 11:53 AM
'He Got Game' goes with...

Vin Baker
10/5/2013 11:55 AM (edited)
Tang..did you just point at the scoreboard??? 12 MJ's won't help you now....
10/5/2013 12:08 PM
GG dh!!! Game 7 in the DDL 70's FINALS today..Great series guy's, Good Luck!!!
of 52
All Forums > SimLeague Basketball > Theme Leagues > DDL#3 - 1990's Draft (league#46043)

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999-2014 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.