Posted by polabonez on 12/3/2013 10:02:00 AM (view original):
I actually have no questions that need answered.
But because I don't necessarily think the right questions are being asked, I'll throw one out there to each of you.
First: dubs. Two part question.
Do you admit that you were behind every member of this jury's exit in this game with the exception of thebish and tsut?
Second part because I already know the answer.
How do you expect these jury members to vote FOR you when you are the primary reason that they are not where you are?
And to red:
You explained how you got to this point in the game, but everyone already knows that. Why do you DESERVE to beat dubs in this finale and have your name on the illustrious GD Survivor wall?
Part 1: Yes
Part 2: I can only expect the people to vote for me that appreciated the way I manipulated the game. If the judgement of your vote is on whether or not the person deliberately eliminated me, then I don't think I can get any of those votes. If it is on whether I deliberately misled someone into feeling safe, then katz and Arfy definitely can't vote for me.
On a side note, Tyson, you know that my philosophy has always been to play hard and try to assure that someone in my main alliance wins, because I don't feel you can get to the end without upsetting the jury. Each jury is different, and what they value over who played a good game is different.
I outlined my web of alliances. It's my feeling that if you have less than that number of alliances, you have to rely on luck to get this far. That said, if you have that many, and you are deliberately letting many of them believe that they are further up your web of alliances than they are in your head, you have to be making enemies as well.