Why do you have so much resistance to the common definition of the word "homosexual?"
Because it's an illogical definition.
It was only created by those with an agenda to justify being homosexual by using propaganda to convince everyone its not a choice but some sort of inherent characteristic, which is ridiculous.
If people didn't feel the need to justify their sexual decisions (which in most cases do not need justified anyway), they wouldn't have felt the need to create this foolish movement aimed at justifying this particular choice by trying to convince everyone it's not a choice.
All of my choices indicate that I like colors other than blue, yet blue is my favorite color. Why? Because I say it is.
You chose to wear something other than your preference in terms of color. So why do you find it so hard to believe that people could choose something other than their preference in a mate?
I can't say that I'm the pope or batman, but I can say that blue is my favorite color and that I'm straight, and those determinations don't require outside validation to be true.
Fundamentally you're saying the same thing you've been saying for some time, which is that attraction determines your sexual status. Correcting for that, the accurate version of what you just said is this:
You can't sayh that you're the pope or batman, but you can say that blue is your favorite color and you are more attracted to women than to men.
The attraction doesn't make you straight by itself, and that's the point.
I left this thread a week ago. I stopped exchanging with biz 4-5 months ago.
That's because you have to be king **** of every conversation you're in, and I knocked you off your pedestal. Your response wasn't to try to climb back on, but to take your ball and go home because you couldn't handle the heat. So be it.
Have you ever eaten a food you didn't like?
Sure. I can't say I've never eaten it just because I didn't like it.
I just realized you think I have an agenda. What is my agenda, exactly? Do we have the same definition of agenda?
To tell people that their actions don't matter when it comes to sexuality, because it has nothing to do with action and everything to do with attraction. This is a BS argument full of logical holes you seek to ignore or hide through denial even when presented with them and pressed for answers.
You haven't even answered several of the questions I posed to you a few posts ago. You just ignored them because they ripped your argument to shreds, and you wont' address them now because you'll pretend not to know what post I'm talking about.
How about answering this one:
So you're heterosexual because you say so, even if you were to have a sexual encounter with a man? You know, because you are whatever the hell you say, no matter what you do?
If somebody is 5''6", 350 lbs, and they shop at the "Big and Tall" store for their clothing, does that mean they are tall?
No. It just means they shop in that store.
You can't even understand how your own questions show your lack of logic. If it weren't for the sheer entertainment, I wouldn't even bother addressing you. Come on - at least burnsy and BL are trying.