If you claim you tell people about your theory on this "propaganda" and they agree with you and have this moment of enlightenment, I'll claim you're a liar.
Claim whatever you want. I'm telling the truth, while you continue to lie and pretend an agenda you support doesn't exist.
Largely because I don't agree with the argument that anything would change if people used your definition of homosexuality.
You REALLY think nothing would change if everyone agreed sexuality was a choice because no propaganda existed and there was no movement to suggest otherwise?
Then you are either in deliberate denial in an effort to support the agenda, or you are incredibly naive. I think it's the first one, but the second is an outside possibility.
(I'm calling it "yours" for simplicity reasons. When you see "yours" substitute it with "what you think the definition of homosexuality is." I'm not as wordy as you are.)
Just replace "yours" with logical (i.e. the logical definition) and that will keep it just as simple and maintain accuracy at the same time.
They could still ask for equal rights, and I don't see why there would be much of a difference in reaction towards it.
Again, this is you being naive, either deliberately or not.
People are (in modern times) far more accepting of biological diversity than they are of choices which create diversity. If you don't understand that, you really need to do some research and compare people's reactions in both situations, because the reactions of most people are incredibly different.
I think you already know that, though. You just won't concede even the simplest point to me out of sheer stubbornness.
You have yet to explain what the difference would be. If there IS no difference, then your argument that the definition has been manipulated for the benefit of a group of people falls on its face.
Of course there is a huge difference, which I already explained: People are as a whole far less accepting of diversity when it is by choice rather than biology. THAT is why the agenda was to get people to think sexuality is biology rather than choice.
If you can't understand why I'm putting quotes around the word "agenda" then you're one of the dumbest people I've ever interacted with, or you're being deliberately dense.
You're putting agenda in quotes because you want to deny its existence since you agree with it. So you've essentially turned quotations marks into your own form of propaganda designed to help an agenda you agree with.