If your inherent sexual orientation is to the opposite sex, then you are heterosexual. If your inherent sexual orientation is to the same sex as yourself, then you are homosexual.
What is this supposed "inherent sexual attraction" based upon? Attraction?
If so, again it begs the question: What about those instances when attraction and action run contrary to one another?
It doesn't matter what you believe or proclaim yourself to be, or how others see you. It's what you are.
So this is your way of saying "because I say so". Got it.
If you're inherently homosexual but "choose" to live a heterosexual lifestyle, it's most likely because you are repressing your sexuality to conform to the norms of society. It's not because your orientation has changed.
What if someone is attracted to the same gender but chooses to be with someone of the opposite gender and it's NOT because they are "repressing their sexuality"? Maybe they tried being with someone of the opposite gender and found it made them happy and decided to stick with it. Maybe they even grow to become more attracted to the person of the opposite gender even though they didn't find them attractive initially - that happens, because what people find attractive can and sometimes does change over time.
Then what? Do you go on insisting they are still homosexual even though they haven't been with someone of the same gender for years, have no desire to do so, and are in fact with someone of the opposite gender and happy with that decision?
Quite a spot you're in here. I'm really interested in how you'd reason your way out of this, because I'm sure it's going to be quite a comical disaster.
Everybody seems to understand this in this thread except for you, who stubbornly refuses to accept any argument counter to your own misguided opinions.
Really with more of the "people agree with me" flawed reasoning?
I'll accept that you have a counter argument as soon as you actually make one.
Right now you seem to be bouncing between two flawed arguments ("because I say so" and "people agree with me") and trying to explain how your supposed concept of "inherent sexual orientation" works since I'm poking more holes in it than swiss cheese.
Going to your example . . . you can call yourself the "billionairre batpope" all you want, but I regret to inform you that you're not.
And you can say we define sexuality based upon "inherent sexual orientation" all you want, but I regret to inform you that this idea is full of holes you haven't even attempted to explain.
You're just an idiot troll on the internet.
You seem to have missed Page 102
where I established that I'm not a troll and suggested those who keep calling me one are only doing so to try to distract from the fact they can't articulate an effective argument against me.
My only question now is this: Do you call everyone who uses logical reasoning to shred your arguments to pieces a troll, or is that only when you get REALLY frustrated? Either way it's hilarious.
Thank you for pointing out that highly trained and educated people in their fields of expertise are misguided idiot liars because they don't see the world as you do. That really clears things up.
It has nothing to do with seeing anything as I do.
I've used logical reasoning to back up my argument that sexuality IS a choice. I've also explained that there is clearly an agenda designed to convince people sexuality isn't a choice through the use of lies and propaganda. This is done to attempt to justify the choices in sexuality so that they will be more accepted by a public that is ready to accept inherent biological differences but not so much those based upon choice.
I think anyone who wants to and possesses sufficient critical thinking skills and intelligence can get past the propaganda and realize that sexuality is a choice. Therefore, if you think sexuality isn't a choice, it is my view that you're either a knowing liar who purports those lies in a deliberate effort to forward the agenda, or you are a fool who can't think critically enough to see past the propaganda's lies.
By the way, exactly who is setting this mysterious agenda that is creating all this insidious propaganda that the rest of us mindless sheep are following? What's in it for them? What's their end game?
I already explained this once, but I'll give you a nutshell:
As I already said, most people are willing to accept differences which are biological, but they are not nearly as accepting of differences caused by choices people make. For example, most people accept those of different races (biological), but may be highly judgmental of those who use their welfare money to buy beer (choices).
Homosexuals, and those who support them, are very well aware of this fact. They know that the REASON the public has long been against the homosexual lifestyle is because it is a choice the public doesn't agree with. But the homosexuals and their supporters want to change that perception.
Eventually they figured out that since people are more accepting of biological differences than choices, the best route to convince society to accept homosexuality would be to sell them on the idea that is somehow not a choice at all.
The campaign to convince everyone sexuality isn't a choice stems from that desire to justify that choice and to get society to accept the homosexual lifestyle.
So in case you somehow couldn't follow that even though I explained it clearly, I'll answer your questions directly:
The agenda is clear, not mysterious, and it is set up by homosexuals and those who support them. What's in it for them is acceptance by the majority of society so that they can live the way they want and demand "rights", as they are presently doing. Their end game is to force everyone to accept their lifestyle choices whether they like it or not.