6/20/2013 10:35 PM
Why wouldn't they?
6/20/2013 10:41 PM
Posted by tecwrg on 6/20/2013 10:35:00 PM (view original):
Why wouldn't they?
I don't know.
6/21/2013 9:52 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 6/20/2013 6:29:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/20/2013 6:23:00 PM (view original):
You really are dumb, aren't you?
Not as dumb as you, apparently.
Aren't you the guy who couldn't quote a post after claiming "No, you said it" AND arguing the point for 4 pages?

Reading comprehension ain't your thang, right?
6/21/2013 9:53 AM
4 Pages?????
6/21/2013 9:58 AM
It was over a short time period yesterday afternoon on a single subject unrelated to SSM.

6/21/2013 9:59 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 6/20/2013 6:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/20/2013 6:02:00 PM (view original):
Quote the post, you dumb ****.

If you can't understand things, that's on you.   No one else.  Just you.

Quote the post.
You never specifically said it was legal. OK, wow, you win??? You still haven't made a point. Unless your point was, "something happened 150 years ago that has exactly zero bearing on anything we are talking about today. So there." 
This one.
6/21/2013 9:59 AM
And???

You still don't have a point. You spent four pages arguing without a point.
6/21/2013 10:01 AM
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/20/2013 5:36:00 PM (view original):
Point A)  You're a ******* idiot with the retention capabilities of an ADD-addled 3 y/o
Point B)  The states that seceded in the 1860s didn't care if it was legal
Point C)  Just because a state does something, like allowing SSM, doesn't mean the Feds have to recognize it
This, you brain-dead ****.

No retention whatsoever.
6/21/2013 10:02 AM
So, your point is, sometimes states do something illegal and the Feds have to step in and stop them?
6/21/2013 10:08 AM
Wow.  Just wow.

You don't really have a job, do you?
6/21/2013 10:10 AM
Yes or no?

Your point was that sometimes states do something illegal and the Feds have to step in?
6/21/2013 10:57 AM
Yes or no?  Do you really have a job?  If so, what is it?

You can't remember anything from page to page so I imagine you'd ask "Do you want fries with that?" at least half a dozen times when you take an order.    That would be annoying and you'd be fired promptly.
6/21/2013 11:11 AM
You can't/aren't going to answer.

I'll answer for you, both ways:

Yes, that's mike's point. It's irrelevant though because regulating marriage is a legal power of the states and the Feds have to recognize it once DOMA is thrown out.

OR

No, that's not mike's point. The entire secession topic was a non-sequitur circle jerk without a point.
6/21/2013 11:17 AM
Are you making up **** again?   That didn't turn out so well for you yesterday(although I'm sure you don't remember it).

"So that's no fries?  Or did you supersize?" 
6/21/2013 11:25 AM
of 358

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999-2014 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.