It strikes me as highly ironic that you, who seems to think that A) people are underinformed, lacking access to what you consider "facts" and information not "spun" by the mainstream media and B) a huge proportion of Americans agree with you, but aren't able to make themselves heard, are opposed to net neutrality and prefer a system that allows large entities such as governments and major media/news corporations to purchase the right to superior availability of their own online content and less wealthy individuals and grassroots groups to have their own web content marginalized.