shobob, after reading your chat, I guess I'll try again.
First, #1 on the WW priority might not have the worst 20. They simply won the least games last season with 25+. They don't necessarily need to have ALL the advantages being awarded to the disadvantaged.
Second, we've agreed that there should be no "impact players" available on the WW or the R5. But allowing #1 to collect the best of the non-impact players is an injustice to #2 to #10.
Third, again, only #1 is assured of his 3(should that be the route you take). #2 thru #22 might claim the same three and get none, while playoff team #23 might get the best 3 after the top 3 waived players. Assigning a max number of claims is worse, IMO, than the current set-up.
Finally, it's your world so my opinion doesn't really matter so feel free to ignore it. I'm not sure the people arguing against no WW claims, or for a max limit, are looking at the big picture.