7/12/2014 8:20 AM
out of curiosity, is there anything on here (forums) that would indicate what coaches should look for in players per formation? That might help the newbies out
7/28/2014 4:21 PM
Posted by 0bigzeke0 on 7/6/2014 9:01:00 PM (view original):
Posted by caesari on 7/5/2012 6:47:00 PM (view original):
Courtesy of ozzzball19 and katzphang88

Great potential

1. Sky's the limit (in the AC scouting rreport)
2. Incredible upside potential (in the AC scouting rreport)
3. A truly gifted athlete (in the HC scouting report)
4. Tremendous Potential - He could be a star!
5. World of Potential - Huge upside!
6. a very special player

Good potential
1. Above average potential (in the HC scouting report)
2. He's got the potential to improve his game a lot over 4 years with us. (in the AC scouting report)
3. I'm sure that your guys took some good notes about my game, and recognized that I have an amazing upside to my game. (message from recruit)
4. Upside is my middle name (message from recruit) 
5. "improve a lot" (from AC scouting report)
6. "room to grow".
7. "With a little work, he could be a very good player" (from HC scouting report) 
8. "Good potential for improvement" (from the HC scouting report)
9. "He's not the most gifted athlete . . . but not bad at all." (from the HC scouting report).

Average potential:
1. Looks like he has a hard time making adjustments. (from the HC scouting report)
2. He's made good strides towards reaching his potential over the past couple years. (from the HC scouting report)
3. I think his growth potential is pretty average - nothing special. (from the AC scouting report)
4. My motor never stops running (message from recruit)
5. I give 110% out there (message from recruit)
6. I'm sure that your guys took some good notes about my game, and recognized that I've worked really hard and lived up to my potential. (message from recruit) - This should actually be low potential.
7. "Some room for improvement, but not much." (from HC scouting report)
8. "Probably won't see huge improvements." (from HC scouting report)
9. "He seems slow to pick things up in practice." (from HC scouting report)

Low potential
1. "he's worked really hard in high school and has about reached his potential (from AC scouting report)
2. "tapped out" (from AC or HC scouting report, I forget which -- it's been a while since I've seen this message).
3. Not sure he has the ability to get much better...
Here is the more complete list of potentials:
I've probably sent out 200 AC/HC visits to players.  Off the top of my head I'd say the results were..

Great- Zero players
Good- 75 Players
Average- 120 players
Low- 5 players

I know its a relatively small sample size but are great and low really that rare?
7/28/2014 11:53 PM
Not sure about Low, but Great is rare.  I've only seen 2 in 8 seasons.  Others have reported similar findings. 
7/30/2014 9:32 AM
Posted by dvgagz on 7/28/2014 11:53:00 PM (view original):
Not sure about Low, but Great is rare.  I've only seen 2 in 8 seasons.  Others have reported similar findings. 
Thanks for the info.
7/31/2014 3:51 PM
This season I noticed more of my RBs getting playing time. Even my backup QB usually got about 10-15% percent of the plays. It looks like stamina/fatigue may have creeped in. Has anyone else noticed or confirmed this? If so, what kind of sub rate should I set and is stamina rating now a factor in recruiting targets?
8/1/2014 9:04 PM

Fatigue is in play and has been for some time now.  I think your sub rate is a personal choice.  If you want your backups to get more snaps/playing time, then set your starters sub level at a higher rate like 90 or 95.  if you only want your starters playing, then by all means, set the sub level at 60. 

8/26/2014 7:58 PM
Posted by horndorf on 2/13/2014 10:39:00 AM (view original):
Not going to worry about it, thanks though. I have decided to stop playing.  The new format has no appeal to me and in all actuality it's not even true to real college recruiting which allows for recruits to be recruited at any age per say and attend official visits and non official visits way before their senior seasons end.  Recruiting should be fair to all involved not having to compete against sims that already have a recruit green at 1201pm on the first day.  We should be able to recruit prior and attempt to get greens also to make it fair and balanced. 

3.0 has really turned me off and I have lost the desire to play, love the soccer though so I'll still be there.  Thanks!!
Hadn't really thought about being able to follow/scout players prior to SR year. I agree though that having to battle so much against SIMS is annoying. Most of the time I have to spend all but a few $ of my recruiting budget. It would be nice if SIM's were less involved and we didn't always have to spend so much, especially when a player shows interest. I HATE it when one says I'm at the top of their list goes elsewhere. Then I have to go after somebody whose skill level is MUCH less. I'm  not new either & have won several conference titles in several worlds. It's not like I'm a newbie. I'd REALLY like to see recruiting & spending made a little easier. If it keeps up I'll likely quit when all my seasons end.
of 8

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999-2014 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.