There isn't any to look up. It doesn't exist. Young earth theories aren't based on evidence. They are based on religion.
The evidence is there to be found, so what you're saying here means one of two things:
1. You didn't bother to look for anything at all;
2. You did look and found the evidence but don't want to admit it.
Either way, I don't care. Your insistence upon declaring something and having it be the case gets more ridiculous with nearly every post you make.
Also, bad_luck has no active teams. What kind of person would someone frequent this website just to use the forums?
That's because bad_luck is a user name he created so he can cause trouble on the boards without letting people know his REAL identity which is used to play the games. Either that or he just doesn't play the games and his sole purpose here is to cause trouble.
Nobody else has been able to come up with the same numbers the original experimenters came up with, though.
Other theories are full of these types of things too.
For example, the Urey-Miller experiment is often cited by those arguing a pro-evolution stance despite the many flaws with the experiment, including evidence that suggests the early environment was not at all like the one used and that they manipulated the situation until it worked (which means they didn't allow it to develop on its own but rather used their intelligence to intervene, something which would ruin its validity in showing things could develop on their own).