Lowest winning % of any school Topic

I just have access to Knight & Tark, and among those 2 worlds, the lowest winning percentage is Bentley, D2Knight.  Amazingly, they had a human coach for over 30 seasons, but it's possible he may have been intentionally tanking at the end?

In any event, does any other world have a school with a lower lifetime winning % than .251?

  Bentley 397 1186 .251


58 Sim AI 9-19 6-7 2-11 1-1 7-9   176 91 -  
57 Sim AI 12-16 7-7 4-8 1-1 7-9   179 192 C-  
56 Sim AI 11-16 7-7 4-8 0-1 6-10   229 256 D  
55 reigny 0-27 0-13 0-13 0-1 0-16   276 255 D-  
54 reigny 0-27 0-14 0-12 0-1 0-16   276 260 D-  
53 reigny 1-26 1-11 0-14 0-1 1-15   276 258 D-  
52 reigny 1-26 1-13 0-12 0-1 1-15   276 265 D-  
51 reigny 0-27 0-13 0-13 0-1 0-16   276 275 D-  
50 reigny 2-25 2-11 0-13 0-1 0-16   265 133 D-  
49 reigny 1-26 1-13 0-12 0-1 0-16   257 70 D-  
48 reigny 1-26 1-12 0-13 0-1 1-15   267 166 D-  
47 reigny 0-27 0-12 0-14 0-1 0-16   276 265 D-  
46 reigny 0-27 0-13 0-13 0-1 0-16   271 161 D-  
45 reigny 3-24 3-10 0-13 0-1 1-15   272 199 D  
44 reigny 5-22 4-10 1-11 0-1 2-14   228 103 D  
43 reigny 1-26 1-12 0-13 0-1 1-15   276 227 D-  
42 reigny 1-26 0-13 1-12 0-1 0-16   266 150 D-  
41 reigny 0-27 0-13 0-13 0-1 0-16   274 217 D  
40 reigny 12-16 5-7 6-8 1-1 7-9   188 246 D+  
39 reigny 7-20 5-9 2-10 0-1 4-12   241 210 D  
38 reigny 2-25 1-12 1-12 0-1 0-16   270 243 D-  
37 reigny 2-25 2-11 0-13 0-1 2-14   272 199 D  
36 reigny 9-18 3-10 6-7 0-1 4-12   200 215 D  
35 reigny 0-27 0-13 0-13 0-1 0-16   274 205 D-  
34 reigny 0-27 0-14 0-12 0-1 0-16   264 105 D  
33 reigny 13-15 7-6 5-8 1-1 7-9   154 177 C-  
32 reigny 10-18 5-8 4-9 1-1 6-10   205 204 D+  
31 reigny 2-25 1-12 1-12 0-1 2-14   275 266 D+  
30 reigny 9-19 2-10 6-8 1-1 6-10   179 138 C-  
29 reigny 10-17 5-6 5-10 0-1 6-10   167 146 C  
28 reigny 15-12 8-5 7-6 0-1 9-7   157 261 C  
27 reigny 12-15 7-6 5-8 0-1 8-8   129 86 C  
26 reigny 13-15 6-7 6-7 1-1 7-9   135 133 C+  
25 reigny 17-12 10-2 5-9 2-1 9-7   112 184 C+  
24 reigny 18-11 7-5 10-5 1-1 8-8   93 147 C+ PI (1st Round)
23 reigny 10-17 5-7 5-9 0-1 6-10   178 171 C-  
22 reigny 5-22 1-11 4-10 0-1 2-14   201 81 C-  
21 reigny 13-15 8-5 4-9 1-1 7-9   139 170 C  
20 reigny 16-12 9-4 6-7 1-1 9-7   107 128 C+  
19 reigny 10-17 6-5 4-11 0-1 5-11   188 222 C  
18 reigny 14-14 8-5 5-8 1-1 7-9   127 130 C+  
17 reigny 17-10 9-4 8-5 0-1 10-6   95 118 C+  
16 reigny 16-12 9-4 6-7 1-1 9-7   135 234 C  
15 reigny 9-18 3-10 6-7 0-1 2-14   216 249 C-  
14 reigny 8-20 3-10 4-9 1-1 5-11   192 112 C-  
13 Sim AI 9-18 4-10 5-7 0-1 4-12   193 164 C-  
12 Sim AI 10-17 6-8 4-8 0-1 5-11   182 138 C-  
11 Sim AI 8-19 6-7 2-11 0-1 7-9   243 250 D+  
10 Sim AI 11-16 8-5 3-10 0-1 5-11   194 226 D+  
9 Sim AI 4-23 4-10 0-12 0-1 1-15   245 126 D  
8 Sim AI 6-21 6-8 0-12 0-1 3-13   244 157 D  
7 Sim AI 5-22 2-11 3-10 0-1 3-13   211 57 D  
6 Sim AI 4-23 3-11 1-11 0-1 4-12   249 126 D  
5 Sim AI 0-27 0-15 0-11 0-1 0-16   245 55 D-  
4 Sim AI 4-23 3-12 1-10 0-1 2-14   250 155 D  
3 Sim AI 3-24 2-11 1-12 0-1 2-14   242 66 D+  
2 Sim AI 4-24 1-12 2-11 1-1 1-15   242 79 C-  
1 Sim AI 12-15 6-7 6-7 0-1 5-11   158 80 C  

3/17/2013 12:41 PM
Reigny tries to lose. Just check out all his resume's, noticed him awhile ago.
3/17/2013 12:46 PM
Why would you pay to lose?
3/17/2013 12:48 PM
I was in a conference with him in Phelan for awhile and it certainly seemed like he wasn't trying at all.  I had a 30 something and 0 record against him at one point before the RNG threw him a bone one game and he actually pulled off an upset.  Seems like every world he's in, his records all look about the same, 2-25, 1-26, 0-27.  It's a shame that other human coaches in a conference with him have to play those train wrecks of teams that just kill your RPI/SOS.
3/17/2013 1:02 PM

Yeah, I've noticed that too.  Its weird.

 

3/17/2013 1:13 PM
Maybe he's a celebrity with money to spend?
3/17/2013 1:42 PM
Maybe he works for WIS and gets free seasons and wrecks programs he feels have wronged him in one way or another in real life.
3/17/2013 1:48 PM
If he were trying to tank every season on purpose, it seems like it would be pretty easy to win between 0 and 3 games pretty much every season. He's had some double digit win seasons along the way, so I really have no idea what he's going for.

I always thought it might be a WIS owned accout, for when they need to test something?
3/17/2013 1:54 PM
Alternative id for someone cheating?
3/17/2013 1:57 PM
Posted by bow2dacowz on 3/17/2013 1:57:00 PM (view original):
Alternative id for someone cheating?
I always think this when I see weird stuff. Using recruiting money to FSS or something.
3/17/2013 2:29 PM
 I looked at Naismith, Wooden, Rupp, Smith, Iba, and Crum. The lowest I saw was .291.  So Bentley wins the prize!
3/17/2013 3:41 PM
Central Washington in Phelan is a .283
3/17/2013 5:36 PM
I would also say it was someone using money to FSS but he has teams in other sports as well, most of which seem to be equally bad. Its very very strange. If it was WIS testing things, which I highly doubt bc they can easily create test worlds, then they must be pretty bad at HD.
3/17/2013 5:40 PM
Bentley (1-1)
World: Naismith
Owner Résumé
Nebraska, Omaha (0-0)
World: Wooden
Owner Résumé
Massachusetts Liberal Arts (4-23)
World: Rupp
Owner Résumé
Bentley (0-20)
World: Smith
Owner Résumé
Bentley (1-15)
World: Iba
Owner Résumé
Bentley (0-23)
World: Allen
Owner Résumé
Bentley (1-11)
World: Crum
Owner Résumé
Alaska Fairbanks (0-0)
World: Tarkanian
Owner Résumé
E. New Mexico (4-23)
World: Knight
Owner Résumé
Bentley (0-0)
World: Phelan
Owner Résumé
3/17/2013 5:45 PM
He has a team in almost every world, in every sport! Crazy...
3/17/2013 5:56 PM
12 Next ▸
Lowest winning % of any school Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.