7/12/2013 10:47 AM
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 10:08:00 AM (view original):
Exactly what I have not defended?
Please answer the following:




Gay marriage should be illegal because __________.
7/12/2013 11:04 AM
Posted by bistiza on 7/12/2013 9:55:00 AM (view original):
What a surprise you attack tec, genghisxcon, since it's incredibly likely you either ARE bad_luck with another user name or are somehow closely acquainted with him. I established that long ago, so I just wanted to make sure tec and others are aware of it here.

Let's put it bluntly: If you've ever disagreed with BL on anything, I've never seen it, and plenty of people disagree with BL so it shouldn't be hard to find an instance of you doing it.

I've argued with tec too but I don't think he's half as bad as you make him out to be. Give the guy some credit; he defends what he believes in and he's not doing a bad job.



To my knowledge, bad_luck and I agree that...


1) ...you're narcissistic and delusional. That's hardly basis for claiming that we're the same person. Even tec agrees.
2) ...young earth theory is bunk. See above. Also, see any credible scientist.
3) ...gay marriage should be legal. Over half the country agrees.

It seems that there are a lot of potential aliases, according to your way of thinking.



I almost forgot, we disagreed on who was more disconnected from reality, you or swampy. Now, of course, the point is moot. Long may you reign.
7/12/2013 11:16 AM
Posted by genghisxcon on 7/12/2013 10:47:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 10:08:00 AM (view original):
Exactly what I have not defended?
Please answer the following:




Gay marriage should be illegal because __________.
Gay marriage should be illegal because human culture has defined marriage as being between one man and one woman.

That was my first word on the subject, and my final word on the subject.  After 290 pages, I'm not going to revisit that discussion any longer.
7/12/2013 11:33 AM
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 11:16:00 AM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 7/12/2013 10:47:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 10:08:00 AM (view original):
Exactly what I have not defended?
Please answer the following:




Gay marriage should be illegal because __________.
Gay marriage should be illegal because human culture has defined marriage as being between one man and one woman.

That was my first word on the subject, and my final word on the subject.  After 290 pages, I'm not going to revisit that discussion any longer.
Marriage still is between a man and a woman. Is there a reason we can't expand it to include gays?
7/12/2013 11:40 AM
I almost forgot, we disagreed on who was more disconnected from reality, you or swampy. Now, of course, the point is moot. Long may you reign.

So the only example you can come up with for you disagreeing with yourself is your pathetic attempt to insult me because you know I absolutely own you in any debate or argument you try with me?

If so, I'm actually MORE inclined to think you and BL are one and the same.

As for disconnect from reality, you are firmly planted on that throne yourself. Even if I were trying I couldn't de-throne your insanity.
7/12/2013 11:43 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2013 11:33:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 11:16:00 AM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 7/12/2013 10:47:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 10:08:00 AM (view original):
Exactly what I have not defended?
Please answer the following:




Gay marriage should be illegal because __________.
Gay marriage should be illegal because human culture has defined marriage as being between one man and one woman.

That was my first word on the subject, and my final word on the subject.  After 290 pages, I'm not going to revisit that discussion any longer.
Marriage still is between a man and a woman. Is there a reason we can't expand it to include gays?
What part about "After 290 pages, I'm not going to revisit that discussion any longer" confuses you?
7/12/2013 11:54 AM
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 11:16:00 AM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 7/12/2013 10:47:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 10:08:00 AM (view original):
Exactly what I have not defended?
Please answer the following:




Gay marriage should be illegal because __________.
Gay marriage should be illegal because human culture has defined marriage as being between one man and one woman.

That was my first word on the subject, and my final word on the subject.  After 290 pages, I'm not going to revisit that discussion any longer.
That's kinda his point.  You make this statement, and when asked to expand upon your reasoning on those thoughts, you really don't dive deeper.  You kinda dodged a lot of questions, often by referring back to page 3 or whatever the first time you made this point.  

It's like me saying if I said "food has always been X, I don't believe we should include all this fake manufactured stuff as food," and you asked "what's the harm in this change in definition" and I said "see my first statement. keeping this tradition is important to me" you might get frustrated. 
7/12/2013 11:55 AM
The part were you argued for 290 pages without giving an answer to a simple question.
7/12/2013 12:36 PM

Well golly, I guess you got me there.

I suppose it would have been much better if I had just kept saying "it doesn't affect you" and "what's the harm?" for 290 pages.

That's much more effective.

7/12/2013 12:38 PM
tec doesn't have to defend his views, but everyone has to defend theirs. Also child porn owners have advocates in MikeT and tec.
7/12/2013 12:38 PM
Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 11:54:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 11:16:00 AM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 7/12/2013 10:47:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 10:08:00 AM (view original):
Exactly what I have not defended?
Please answer the following:




Gay marriage should be illegal because __________.
Gay marriage should be illegal because human culture has defined marriage as being between one man and one woman.

That was my first word on the subject, and my final word on the subject.  After 290 pages, I'm not going to revisit that discussion any longer.
That's kinda his point.  You make this statement, and when asked to expand upon your reasoning on those thoughts, you really don't dive deeper.  You kinda dodged a lot of questions, often by referring back to page 3 or whatever the first time you made this point.  

It's like me saying if I said "food has always been X, I don't believe we should include all this fake manufactured stuff as food," and you asked "what's the harm in this change in definition" and I said "see my first statement. keeping this tradition is important to me" you might get frustrated. 
I did expand on my reasoning.  I said that it doesn't make sense to me to change an ages old definition on a whim.  Doing anything on a whim is not necessarily a good idea.
7/12/2013 12:41 PM
I've answered every question you've asked.

The reason you can't give an answer is that there is no harm in allowing gay marriage. We know this because gay marriage is legal now in plenty of places and nothing bad has happened because of it.

What you should have said 290 pages ago is, "you're right, there is no harm, I just don't like gay people." The discussion would have stopped there.
7/12/2013 1:00 PM
How long do you need to determine "no harm"?   A couple of days?  A week?  A year?

Even in biz's 10,000 y/o earth, 10-12 years is a very short period of time. 
7/12/2013 1:04 PM
I'll try to put this in a way that you should understand but obviously won't.

There are people out there that feel legalizing SSM is bad for society.  

Your opinion is no more, or less, valid than their opinion. 
7/12/2013 1:07 PM
Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 12:36:00 PM (view original):

Well golly, I guess you got me there.

I suppose it would have been much better if I had just kept saying "it doesn't affect you" and "what's the harm?" for 290 pages.

That's much more effective.

I didn't do that.
of 358

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999-2014 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.