All Forums > General Discussion > Non-Sports > We Need Knife Control Laws - STAT!!!
4/9/2013 2:02 PM
4/9/2013 3:03 PM
14 WOUNDED?

IF THEY HAD BEEN A GUN NRA-NUT WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE, WOULDA BEEN SCORES DEAD

THE NEXT NRA-SPONSORED MASSACRES ARE A COMING

YE WANT TO PLAY WITH GUNS, JOIN THE ARMY OR POLICE FORCE, TOUGH GUYS.

4/9/2013 3:15 PM
 If we did better for those with mental health disorders, it could have been 0 wounded. 
4/9/2013 3:24 PM
If one of the 14 wounded had a gun, we'd probably have 2 wounded and one would be riddled with bullet holes.
4/10/2013 11:58 AM
Posted by antoncresten on 4/9/2013 3:03:00 PM (view original):
14 WOUNDED?

IF THEY HAD BEEN A GUN NRA-NUT WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE, WOULDA BEEN SCORES DEAD

THE NEXT NRA-SPONSORED MASSACRES ARE A COMING

YE WANT TO PLAY WITH GUNS, JOIN THE ARMY OR POLICE FORCE, TOUGH GUYS.

Really? Scores?

For people who dont use the term often a score is 20.

So in the history of American shooting how many killed scores?

Answer of course is zero.
4/10/2013 12:34 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/police-say-suburban-phoenix-man-killed-wife-over-fear-he-has-hiv-and-then-killed-adult-son/2013/04/10/7d9cdd16-a1ee-11e2-bd52-614156372695_story.html
4/11/2013 4:18 AM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/10/2013 11:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by antoncresten on 4/9/2013 3:03:00 PM (view original):
14 WOUNDED?

IF THEY HAD BEEN A GUN NRA-NUT WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE, WOULDA BEEN SCORES DEAD

THE NEXT NRA-SPONSORED MASSACRES ARE A COMING

YE WANT TO PLAY WITH GUNS, JOIN THE ARMY OR POLICE FORCE, TOUGH GUYS.

Really? Scores?

For people who dont use the term often a score is 20.

So in the history of American shooting how many killed scores?

Answer of course is zero.
wow, Swamp plays the semantics card. Well-done Grasshopper...you have learned from the Master. I find that gratifying.
4/11/2013 4:20 AM
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/9/2013 3:24:00 PM (view original):
If one of the 14 wounded had a gun, we'd probably have 2 wounded and one would be riddled with bullet holes.
Missing the point, Scott Norwood style.
4/11/2013 8:52 AM
Do tell the point.

Seems to me the "point" of this thread is that a crazy can injure a lot of people without a firearm.
4/11/2013 7:18 PM
Posted by seamar_116 on 4/11/2013 4:18:00 AM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/10/2013 11:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by antoncresten on 4/9/2013 3:03:00 PM (view original):
14 WOUNDED?

IF THEY HAD BEEN A GUN NRA-NUT WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE, WOULDA BEEN SCORES DEAD

THE NEXT NRA-SPONSORED MASSACRES ARE A COMING

YE WANT TO PLAY WITH GUNS, JOIN THE ARMY OR POLICE FORCE, TOUGH GUYS.

Really? Scores?

For people who dont use the term often a score is 20.

So in the history of American shooting how many killed scores?

Answer of course is zero.
wow, Swamp plays the semantics card. Well-done Grasshopper...you have learned from the Master. I find that gratifying.
I did play semantics a bit, but the wild claims of the anti-gun nuts need to be checked.

And again was there anything that was different during the Clinton Gun Ban that would make us think another one would help?
4/11/2013 7:42 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/10/2013 11:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by antoncresten on 4/9/2013 3:03:00 PM (view original):
14 WOUNDED?

IF THEY HAD BEEN A GUN NRA-NUT WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE, WOULDA BEEN SCORES DEAD

THE NEXT NRA-SPONSORED MASSACRES ARE A COMING

YE WANT TO PLAY WITH GUNS, JOIN THE ARMY OR POLICE FORCE, TOUGH GUYS.

Really? Scores?

For people who dont use the term often a score is 20.

So in the history of American shooting how many killed scores?

Answer of course is zero.
zero killed scores? seems I can think of a few off the top of my head that killed that many...Newton, VA Tech, McDonalds, Luby's.....
4/11/2013 9:07 PM
scores would mean at least 2 score and that would be 40.
4/11/2013 9:11 PM
alright-well if scores means 40, then I'm wrong
4/11/2013 9:44 PM
8, 14, 18, 22, 40...,,...0.
4/11/2013 9:49 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/11/2013 8:52:00 AM (view original):
Do tell the point.

Seems to me the "point" of this thread is that a crazy can injure a lot of people without a firearm.
The point dunderhead, is that if he had used a gun he undoubtedly would have killed people, and those injured would have been hurt more seriously. Using a knife he had to get up close and personal, and was able to be taken down by those who were unarmed.

As I said...Scott Norwood style--wide right.
of 4
All Forums > General Discussion > Non-Sports > We Need Knife Control Laws - STAT!!!

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999-2014 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.