In the end, you're trying to marginalize the season into the games that you want to consider while basically throwing out the rest of the stuff, while trying to create context with your 2/3 seed over 6/7 seed argument.
You want your big games weighed/weighted more, and they shouldn't be, the schedule is 25 games to this point, and each game should have equal worth. I know with real life/game SOS, they have Wooster's SOS 6th and yours 33rd, but that's based on raw win percentages and it's really a rather ****** system. There's a pretty sizable difference in your schedules, even just giving it the eye test when I was entering the data...I entered Wooster's first, and then when I saw your schedule and the RPIs of all the teams you played...I thought to myself...no chance, and I guess I'm kinda surprised that you're as close as you are in my rankings.
You can't weigh particular games/instances twice and other games/instances only once, just because they hold more importance to you and your cause...it just isn't fair...that's why reviewing wins v. top 25...25-50...50-100, etc is pointless, because in a good system it's already been analyzed and appropriated solidly and correctly. I'm sorry, but you don't deserve to be ahead of Wooster at this stage of the game.