Lol, I have made up my mind, if I do do what I'm proposing, it will only be in regards to games v. FCS opponents. Moranis is talking about 90-125 and that's out of bounds as far as I'm concerned, but why I bring this up is because a game (or two) v. rank #126 in a 12 game schedule is going to downgrade your SOS, significantly. Not all FBS teams play an FCS school, and in previous versions of my rankings, I have more or less considered games v. D1-AA/FCS competition to be exhibition games (of sorts) until Michigan-App State flipped that upside down. The increase in the FCS opponents seems to correlate/coincide with the mandate of the 12 game schedule that happened sometime between 2004 and 2007, and teams are really just using FCS as filler so they can get another payday by filling their stadium and potential TV dollars...it's another way that money has bastardized the "sanctity" of college football...it's a shame really.
Counting only FCS losses seems to be a good/sound policy to me at the moment, I just want to see what others' think. In moranis' defense, he's basically been making his same argument for 6, 7, 8 years...I still don't agree with him, but I appreciate his input. Anyone that makes you think is beneficial.