It seems to me that the coaching eligibility is too tight. A human coach is always preferable to a SIM. I am in a couple of mid-major conferences and we actively try to recruit new coaches to join us. It is frustrating when are recruiting efforts are rewarded by the applicants being turned down. I think the sim teams should always take the best human applicant that applies. What do you guys think?
Posted by emy1013 on 8/29/2013 1:34:00 PM (view original):I would agree that 99.99% of the time a human coach is preferable to a Sim coach, but that 0.01% the rest of the time the human coach is named Reigny. Those familiar with his "resume" will understand exactly what I mean.
Posted by colonels19 on 8/29/2013 2:37:00 PM (view original):Norman Dale?
Posted by colonels19 on 8/29/2013 2:46:00 PM (view original):I guess I am lol, sorry if my brain isn't up to snuff at the moment
Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games
© 1999- WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.