All Forums > Hoops Dynasty Basketball > Hoops Dynasty > Which is the better PG to recruit for? FB/FCP Set
2/1/2014 6:47 PM
PG #1
Kenneth Sluski
Athleticism 83
 
Speed 72
 
Rebounding 25
 
Defense 60
 
Shot Blocking 12
 
Low-post 29
 
Perimeter 44
 
Ball Handling 62
 
Passing 65
 
Work Ethic 36
 
Stamina 74
 
Durability 64
 

Previous Season Stats
GP MPG PPG RPG FG% FG3% FT% APG SPG BPG
26 27 32.9 0.5 70.0 41.0 57.7 4.4 1.2 1.4

PG #2
Bart Hutchinson

Athleticism 48
 
Speed 88
 
Rebounding 8
 
Defense 61
 
Shot Blocking 1
 
Low-post 5
 
Perimeter 90
 
Ball Handling 67
 
Passing 90
 
Work Ethic 34
 
Stamina 69
 
Durability 32
 
Previous Season Stats
GP MPG PPG RPG FG% FG3% FT% APG SPG BPG
19 23 30.6 0.5 60.8 58.0 66.1 5.8 3.4 1.1

 Trying to decide which is the better PG to recruit for FB/FCP Sets. Not sure about their potential.
2/1/2014 6:55 PM
#2. I don't think the 35 points of Ath are worth 16 speed, 45 per and 35 pass.
2/3/2014 5:43 PM
#2 very easily.
2/3/2014 7:47 PM
I beg to differ. You need sp for fb and ath, def for fcp. Also you really don't need per for fb, but lp will help in fb with driving. I would take #1.
2/3/2014 9:55 PM
#2, not close
2/3/2014 10:32 PM
U can take #2 all u want. He will be a foul machine. Yes #2 is better for fb with speed, per, pass, but u have to think about fcp.
2/4/2014 7:01 AM
I'd definitely take #1 and I don't really think it's close. The 1st will foul out far too often for the added passing to matter.
All Forums > Hoops Dynasty Basketball > Hoops Dynasty > Which is the better PG to recruit for? FB/FCP Set

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999-2014 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.