Weekly Top 10 Review Topic

Posted by MikeT23 on 9/18/2014 1:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by stinenavy on 9/16/2014 2:41:00 PM (view original):
South Carolina got beat up at home. There's no reason they should be considered if they end up with 2 losses.

Oklahoma has an important game this week. Alabama only beat WV by 10, so it'll be good for them to try and pack on points to have a good margin of victory.
Here.   The important part:

"There's no reason they should be considered if they end up with 2 losses."

Hell, you're saying "I don't care if they win the SEC championship.   There is absolutely no reason they should be in the CFB playoffs with two losses."
Yea. Just omit the first sentence that refers specifically to South Carolina.
9/18/2014 5:15 PM
So losing at home would eliminate a two loss team?
9/18/2014 5:33 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 9/18/2014 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Sure I have.   The NCAA puts in a lot of time "investigating" college football procedures.   It's a poor business model to do stuff for free.   
They don't get playoff money, that doesn't mean they do it for free.  Your leaps in logic truly are astounding.
9/18/2014 5:50 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 9/18/2014 5:33:00 PM (view original):
So losing at home would eliminate a two loss team?
How about that another misrepresentation and misquote by mike.  At least you are consistent.
9/18/2014 5:51 PM
It's a question.   It wasn't even a quote.   Do you know what a quote is?
9/18/2014 7:12 PM
Yea, I know what a quote is. Where's the quote of someone saying, "No two loss team can make the College Football playoff."

You keep referring to it, but it's nowhere to be found.
9/18/2014 7:29 PM
Are you and moranis the same person?
9/18/2014 7:39 PM
Explain to me, exactly and using small words, why SC should not be considered if they finish the season with 2 losses.  
9/18/2014 7:40 PM
Find me the quote of someone saying "No two loss team can make the College Football playoff", and then I'll answer your question.
9/18/2014 7:44 PM

Can't do it.   Now answer the question in a way so simplistic that even a 5 y/o can't misunderstand.   I really want to understand what you mean.  Obviously you're using words I can't comprehend because, every time I interpret them, I get "There's no reason South Carolina should be considered if they end up with 2 losses."

 

9/18/2014 8:07 PM
When I say "South Carolina" do you think I mean all teams? Obviously you think I do because you have no comprehension skills. You're twisting what people are saying and refuse to admit you are wrong. Bad luck falls for that ****, go find him if you want to play that game.

If I call you a ******* idiot, do you think I'm referring to everyone?
9/18/2014 8:19 PM

What makes South Carolina's situation unique to other potential two loss teams?

9/18/2014 9:27 PM
RETAHD  ROYALE RUMBLE
9/19/2014 5:18 AM
Auburn gets lucky and pulls it out as Kansas State doesn't score from inside the 30 yard line 5 separate times: missing 3 FG's, having a WR get hit in the pads in the end zone which bounces to Auburn for an INT, and a fumble. 
9/19/2014 9:21 AM
Auburn was not impressive.    With their schedule, they better get better fast or expect to play in the Weed Eater Bowl.
9/19/2014 10:58 AM
◂ Prev 1...6|7|8|9|10...53 Next ▸
Weekly Top 10 Review Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.