Well, I shouldn't make it sound widespread. But I've read at least three articles by different writers/websites saying that the 49ers hopes were dashed when they lost home field advantage (which is assuming they already have).

But either way, let's keep in mind that the '07 Pats looked just as dominant as the Packers and didn't win the Superbowl.  Anything can happen.

The only other way for the 49ers to beat the Packers is if Green Bay plays, say, the Cowboys in their first playoff game and DeMarcus Ware breaks Aaron Rodgers in half during a 38-10 Packer win.

Then, in a blinding snowstorm at Lambeau, Frank Gore runs for 120 yards in a 14-7 49er victory.

Remember, you heard it here first.

Counting playoffs, the Packers have won 19 straight games, second all-time to the '03-'04 Patriots.

Raider won the second half 16-15.   BOO-YEAH!!!!!

Yes, it is entirely possible the Raiders starters are superior to the Packers' second string.

Quit making excuses, homer.

Posted by kermit on 12/12/2011 10:15:00 AM (view original):
Yes, it is entirely possible the Raiders starters are superior to the Packers' second string.

Yes, it is entirely possible that the Raiders starters are superior to the Packers second string, who couldnt have cared less after being up 43-7 when inserted in the THIRD QUARTER

FIFY

Any word on Jennings?

Not yet; McCarthy's press conference usually starts at 3pm Central Time, but I'm not sure if they would have MRI results back yet today.

After seeing firsthand how bad the Raiders were, the thought of playing the Chiefs intimidated him

What about Finley.  Did he play?

Finley played but had no receptions. The box score shows no targets.

Jennings will miss a couple of weeks, but they expect him back for the playoffs.

RAIDERS SHUT FINLEY DOWN!!!!!

I think it was more a case of ARodg shutting him down after his three drops last week.