guess I'll throw in my belated review thoughts as well.
$70M: superpowerless, 62-47 (+.063 pyth), first place
Obviously I'm pleased with the way this team's working out. Hank Greenberg has been very effective, hitting .343/.411/.764 with a league-leading 51 HR and 138 RBI. Jimmy Key is 16-4 with a 3.38 ERA. I was worried about pitching fatigue, but so far it hasn't been an issue. I'm running my mop-up pitchers into the ground, of course, but my starters and relievers are all doing fine. Offensive fatigue hasn't been a serious issue either; my players seem to be pretty steady at 98%–99%. However, I have only a 2 game lead in the division, and the wild card leader is also at 62 wins, so there's not a lot of room for error with this team.
$80M: 1st in peace 24-33 sens, 73-36 (+.076 pyth), first place
This has been my best team since the beginning, and it's good to see something work out just as expected. The offense has been key, scoring the most runs in the league. Not really any studs in the lineup—Heinie Manush (.320/.355/.460) and Joe Cronin (.330/.405/.433) are the only real highlights—but it's a balanced lineup that doesn't give up a lot of outs (.346 OBP, third in the league). Pitching has only been about average, but it's been good enough. Garland Braxton hasn't been quite the ace I was hoping for, but he's still 15-7 with a 3.26 ERA. Relief pitching I thought might be a weakness, and while it hasn't been great, it's been good enough. Bobby Burke has been especially good (1.22 WHIP, 2.87 ERA). I have a solid 6-game lead in my division and the best record in the league right now, so I'm feeling pretty confident.
$90M: '24 bucs, babe and eppa, 64-45 (+.042 pyth), first place
Like my other two <$100M teams, this one has also performed pretty much just as I expected. Babe Ruth has been excellent, hitting .329/.440/.605 with 29 HR and 95 RBI, making this team the fourth-best offense in the league despite the fact that nobody else really hits worth a damn. Ruth and KikiCuyler (.340/.385/.490) are the only guys I have who top a .730 OPS. Max Carey has been a huge disappointment, hitting only .256/.335/.350, but fortunately it hasn't dragged down the whole team. Of course, one reason I took the Pirates was that their range was excellent even if they couldn't hit, and that's been the case: we lead the league in + plays with 27 and - plays with only 5. The pitching has been okay; although Eppa Rixey has been a disappointment (10-9, 3.22 ERA), Johnny Morrison has picked up the slack (15-5, 2.86). Babe Adams has been excellent as closer (29/32 saves, 2.81 ERA), although Arnie Stone has not been the setup guy I thought he'd be (6.04 ERA, 1.61 WHIP). We're not running away with the division (4-game lead), but we are tied for the best record in the league right now, so I think this team's in good shape.
$100M: phils+dodgers '89, 51-58 (+.112 pyth), third place (-5 games)
This team has been by far the biggest disappointment in the championship. I loved the 1989 Phillies twist offense, but it hasn't performed up to par at all. Mike Schmidt really makes or breaks the team, and he's hitting only .259/.373/.488. Dickie Thon and Dwayne Murphy have been abysmal. As a team we're hitting only .234/.327/.347, which is obviously just awful. The pitching hasn't been particularly good either, although John Tudor is having a great season (only 10-10, but 2.39 ERA and 1.10 WHIP). Shorting innings really hurt me here, as I've had to use my mop-up guys a lot and my offense doesn't really afford me that luxury. Since the rest of my division hasn't been particularly good either, we're still technically in the race, but as far as I'm concerned the best case scenario would be a .500 record.
$120M: king of all cosmos, 56-53 (+.054 pyth), third place (-7 games)
I don't really know what to say about this team; we're a few ticks below average both on offense and in pitching, but we're hovering around .500. I have the dubious distinction of the worst 1886 King Kelly in the league (.313/.417/.393) and the second worst 1894 Sam Thompson (.337/.386/.463), despite playing in the offense-friendly Baker Bowl. I thought 1899 Buck Freeman would be an overperformer with his fluke HR rate, but coincidentally I also have the worst one of him in the league (.236/.278/.341). On pitching I've been about average, but with my offensive struggles that hasn't translated to much success. All in all, I'm pretty happy that we're sticking around above .500, and hope to continue doing so.
$140M: 5 ft. high and rising, 61-48 (+.061 pyth), second place (-1 game)
Well, I did a good job drafting my offense for this team; we lead the league in runs and are hitting .320/.407/.475. Good old reliable cookie 1993 Tony Phillips has been particularly awesome, hitting .367/.449/.462 with 85 runs scored. My other usual suspects (Ruth, Williams, Boggs, Foxx) are all doing great, so nothing to complain about there. My pitching has not been good, with a 7.24 team ERA, but that's largely to do the predictable fatigue problems that have been plaguing me. I've had to burn two relievers to try and stay ahead, with obviously mixed results. Still, on the whole we're doing okay. I've been in a dogfight with homiealiens for the division for a while now, and with the current wild card leader is at 63, the playoff race is pretty crowded. I'm hoping that my recent sacrifice of another reliever for mop-up duty will give me enough breathing room to continue getting good innings from the remainder of my bullpen; obviously I'm really looking to secure a fourth playoff team in this league.