I was thinking about your last post in the update thread, can you post examples of 'one arb' guys that you have had on your squad?

I might be able to do better than that.    My MG team needed a reboot.  Basically everyone got old at the same time and my minors/40 man was full of 1-arb guys.  It's most of my BL team right now(position players).     Not sure any of these guys will see a 2m per year salary:

Name (bats)		Age	Pos	%															Opt	$
Jolbert Santiago (L)		25	RF	100	82	76	53	70	63	68	45	62	54	65	62	67	65	9	-	$327K
Myron Weaver (L)		31	2B	100	79	100	60	37	67	82	49	65	65	78	82	89	87	9	-	$327K
Ivan Pujols (R)		23	C	100	76	75	44	52	39	26	59	41	5	42	52	76	78	82	3	$327K
Trent Nation (L)		31	RF	100	70	79	58	66	90	75	54	68	66	10	25	67	63	34	-	$343K
Homer Price (L)		27	CF	100	82	42	84	42	44	55	69	47	72	83	78	65	57	9	1	$343K
Cookie Guzman (L)		27	CF	100	75	93	19	47	55	58	45	73	92	92	73	60	57	11	-	$343K
Charlie Mateo (R)		28	3B	100	77	85	22	99	54	59	49	42	51	61	67	74	64	6	-	$343K
Joe Guerrier (R)		30	C	100	72	64	83	71	83	57	74	18	63	3	20	64	54	51	-	$343K
D'Angelo Infante (R)		31	RF	100	77	68	72	42	74	74	71	47	52	60	61	73	71	8	-	$360K
Pedro Juarez (R)		28	3B	100	78	99	81	59	81	60	52	60	86	76	79	88	86	4	-	$360K

My SS, 1B and LF are not included in that group as they are not 1-arb guys. 

How did the fat Midwestern slobs do against the sleek fit West Coast team this weekend?

I think Belichick-level cheating was involved.   The outcome is under review.

Is there any disadvantage to keeping a prospect at a level where they are clobbering the competition?

I have

https://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerRatings.aspx?pid=7653938

At high A, but now I'm wondering if AA would be better.

I'd put him with the better coach.   I don't have an issue with repeating a level.   In fact, I demoted a few players in MG to LoA because my HiA coach was crap.

How the heck does a player with a blister on his finger permanently lose points in control and health?

Could be low medical or an older player. 

RINGO!!!!

Posted by MikeT23 on 12/27/2015 7:42:00 AM (view original):
Could be low medical or an older player. 

It's for sure low medical (only 14 mill as it's my first year with the team)

I'm just joking around as in real life (I know the sim is nothing like real life) how a blister could cause permanent damage?

Infection.

So... I think you may have spoken on this before. If a team that is absolutely dominating a world over a number of years, does it really make sense to trade with such a team, assuming that team is young, has a lot of depth, and has a moderate payroll?

No matter what the return, isn't sending good prospects to such a team really making your ultimate goal even more difficult?

I tend to shy away from dominant teams as the best way to stay dominant is to move your aging player for a slightly lesser, but still developing, player.    That frees up money to chase the high dollar IFA, stay young/cheap, and rebuild on the fly.   It's less troublesome if they're in the other league as, at worst, you have 1 seven game series to stop them.