I'm surprised that people have such opposition to the idea. I see where you guys are coming from: there's not enough players for the worlds now, but the barrier of entry is difficult. Seeing that I'm joining a league with 100 seasons only reiterates the idea that I'd be in over my head. I think you have 10 worlds, run each for 100 years, then kill it and start a new one. There'd be a new world every decade as one disappears and a new one starts. Or maybe you do it every 15 years and have fewer worlds. Whatever. It just seems to me that shrinking the scope of the game wouldn't attract new coaches. Keeping old, stagnant worlds until the end of eternity won't attract new coaches. There's something to be said for opening day of something new, right?
Out of genuine curiosity, have the active coaches on this forum ever agreed to play one particular world so that they play more human competition?