<<I want someone on th left to admit that Fluke isnt a simple college student. She is a radical activists who deserves to get made fun of.>>
Does having a radical opinion mean you should get called a "slut" and a whore"? Would it not make more sense to attack the merits of the position rather than name call the person? That is what is known as an "ad hominem" attack and is usually a sign that one is unable to attack the argument on its merits.
Whether or not Fluke is a slut or a whore or a Catholic Bishop or believes that God lives on the planet Kolob is irrelevant. If Rush had attacked her ideas, rather than her personally no one would have cared. Admit it your boy screwed the pooch, and as the de facto leader of the GOP he is going to cost the party votes in November.
Radical opinions= Jefferson, Paine, Adams (John and Abigail), Douglass, Luther, Joan of Arc, Jesus, Gandhi....are they sluts and whores?