You posted in on 12/24. I responded on 12/27.
Wrong again. Not surprising given your track record.
You responded to your own assumptions on 12/27 and I corrected you and asked you to go look up the real information. You didn't post a response that actually addressed the real information for 14 days, on 1/8. Two weeks went by which included you posting, indicating you have no excuse that you weren't available or couldn't address it. You simply gave up and REFUSED to address it, and that means you forfeited and lost.
Of course it isn't going to happen, because no rational human being could do it... You said a bunch of stupid ****, why don't you just take it back, apologize to everyone for being a bull-headed ***, and move on with your life instead of continuing to make yourself look like a clown?
This question should be addressed to bad_luck, as it fits perfectly with what he has shown throughout the thread.
As for me, I was attacked for nothing more than thinking for myself rather than blindly following the mainstream opinion like a sheep. So when those of you who launched that attack similar to a 14th century "grab the torches and pitchforks" ignorance festival want to apologize for it, then I'll consider apologizing for stringing bad_luck along in this thread and making him look foolish and apparently making some of you angry because I'm using his attention-seeking against him.
I will not under any circumstances apologize for defending myself - quite successfully, I might add - against the ignorant attacks of the mainstream. I have as much right to my opinion as any of you sheep have to yours.
Classic bis. "If you don't agree with me, you're wrong."
No, that's what some of you are doing with your mainstream bulls*** bullying attempts.
I made a post stating I would leave the thread and not respond unless bad_luck did to prove he had to have the last word, and he responded twice before I even came back, proving me right when I say he had to have the last word.
You want to ignore that and keep attacking out of ignorance.
The main reason I will not ever be addressing the original debate is because I have no interest in discussing these matters with people whose minds are stuck in the 14th century.