You're delusional if you truly believe that your incessant denial of opposing viewpoints, to the point of your "opponents" removing themselves from the discussion out of frustration, can be classified as a "win".
You're in denial and the only question is whether it is purposeful or not.
If it is purposeful, it's not quite so sad, because it means you personally understand you lost the debate but have too much pride to allow me to even suggest it on here without you attacking me and claiming I'm delusional.
If it's not purposeful, then you don't understand how and why you lost because you truly don't believe you did, and that takes true denial there. After all, if you think your position is truly superior, then re-engage me in the debate. You're the won who gave up, not me.
You truly have no self-awareness of how you're perceived.
Oh, I know exactly how I'm perceived by you, and I simply don't care.
The reason is simple: I know you're not objective at all. I know you're frustrated with your inability to defeat me in the debate in question, and your opinion of me stems from that and as a result you will view me in a negative light no matter what.
Even if I cared what you thought of me at one point - and I'm really not here to impress anyone anyway - I certainly don't now because I understand the reasons behind what you think of me for what they are.
In short, you don't take someone's opinion of you seriously when the only reason they feel that way is because they were somehow offended you beat them in a rather meaningless contest, such as the debate we had.
To illustrate, it's like I beat you at seeing how many times we could touch our nose in a minute and you're so angry over it you think I'm the worst person ever. I can't take it seriously because the basis of the opinion is essentially nothing.
Swamp may have the track record, but bistiza is throwing down an avalanche of genuine stupidity.
This is the same situation as tecwrg: Your opinion is essentially meaningless because it is based out of frustration over not being able to defeat me in a logical debate. Re-read the points I made directly above as they apply to you as well.
Basically what it boils down to is this: If your only reason for disliking me is because you can't defeat me in a logical debate, there is no reason for me to care what you think of me, because it's based on nothing more than your ridiculous and childish frustration with the situation, which is basically meaningless.