I am antisapating this next season coming up. I have 16 RCs to bring in.

I really like these reports alot. Most anticipated part of season for me outside of the second half of Title games. I always thought they were accurate until the last update. I now feel they are off a bit. One example would be my two OL recruits. I got into a big bidding war for one that is clearly my best. He is not even ranked although the other is. Winona Div II

I love these as well.  Achilles, which part of his posted formula do you think is inaccurate for OL?

Posted by achillesred on 1/31/2013 11:26:00 AM (view original):
I really like these reports alot. Most anticipated part of season for me outside of the second half of Title games. I always thought they were accurate until the last update. I now feel they are off a bit. One example would be my two OL recruits. I got into a big bidding war for one that is clearly my best. He is not even ranked although the other is. Winona Div II

I assume you are talking about Roberto Smith - his lower rating was based on low TECH and GI.  As you can see, with his growth in those areas, his ratings are improving quite a bit.

Name	Class	Primary Position	Rating	ATH	SPD	DUR	WE	STA	STR	BLK	TKL	HND	GI	ELU	TECH	Overall Rank	Position Rank	Class Rank Overall	Class Rank Position
Roberto Smith	Fr.	OL	49.71	42	3	34	59	34	74	82	28	29	33	43	25	4331	OL738	490	OL73
Roberto Smith	So.	OL	55.75	50	9	42	61	41	78	85	24	25	42	49	34	1732	OL239	194	OL22

I certainly don't think the formulas are perfect, but they are based on what the game designer at the time (JConte) told me were the important attributes for each position.  

bhazlewood.....good point. I guess I just see what I see his senior year and expect him to be higher ranked. Thanx again for those who put these reports up for us