DOMA & Prop 8 Topic

bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:47:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 10:44:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:41:00 AM (view original):
Surely you understand "Doesn't affect you" is universal, right?   Or do we now only apply it to specific causes?
Rape and murder affect *someone*. Marriage affects only the people getting married.
"Doesn't affect you" has been the reason.   Is it now "someone"?

I dare say the families and friends of the couple are affected in some way.
You know this is stupid, you're just trolling.
4/2/2013 10:49 AM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
It's stupid because your only logical reason is "It doesn't affect you so why do you care?"

I find that to be a stupid reason and you admittedly have nothing else. 
4/2/2013 10:52 AM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 10:48:00 AM (view original):
Lawrence makes those laws unenforceable. The laws themselves are illegal. Even your article says so, idiot.
So, in your opinion, no one could be detained for breaking one of those laws?
4/2/2013 10:53 AM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 10:48:00 AM (view original):
Lawrence makes those laws unenforceable. The laws themselves are illegal. Even your article says so, idiot.
So, in your opinion, no one could be detained for breaking one of those laws?
I'm saying the laws are illegal. Anyone could be detained for anything but you can't be convicted of sodomy.
4/2/2013 10:55 AM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:52:00 AM (view original):
It's stupid because your only logical reason is "It doesn't affect you so why do you care?"

I find that to be a stupid reason and you admittedly have nothing else. 
It's stupid because you pretend to not see the difference between a crime violating the rights of others and a marriage violating the rights of no one.
4/2/2013 10:56 AM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Hmmmm.....I'm pretty sure you can only be detained for an illegal activity.     Is it your contention that I COULD be detained for standing in my back yard staring into the woods?
4/2/2013 10:57 AM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 10:56:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:52:00 AM (view original):
It's stupid because your only logical reason is "It doesn't affect you so why do you care?"

I find that to be a stupid reason and you admittedly have nothing else. 
It's stupid because you pretend to not see the difference between a crime violating the rights of others and a marriage violating the rights of no one.
It's stupid because your only logical reason is "It doesn't affect you so why do you care?"

I find that to be a stupid reason and you admittedly have nothing else. 
4/2/2013 10:57 AM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:57:00 AM (view original):
Hmmmm.....I'm pretty sure you can only be detained for an illegal activity.     Is it your contention that I COULD be detained for standing in my back yard staring into the woods?
You can be detained for legal activity. It happens all the time.

And it's beside the point. Sodomy laws are illegal.
4/2/2013 11:01 AM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 10:56:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:52:00 AM (view original):
It's stupid because your only logical reason is "It doesn't affect you so why do you care?"

I find that to be a stupid reason and you admittedly have nothing else. 
It's stupid because you pretend to not see the difference between a crime violating the rights of others and a marriage violating the rights of no one.
It's stupid because your only logical reason is "It doesn't affect you so why do you care?"

I find that to be a stupid reason and you admittedly have nothing else. 
Ok, I'll reword it for you, troll. Gay marriage should be allowed because it doesn't infringe on the rights of anyone else.
4/2/2013 11:02 AM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 11:02:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 10:56:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 10:52:00 AM (view original):
It's stupid because your only logical reason is "It doesn't affect you so why do you care?"

I find that to be a stupid reason and you admittedly have nothing else. 
It's stupid because you pretend to not see the difference between a crime violating the rights of others and a marriage violating the rights of no one.
It's stupid because your only logical reason is "It doesn't affect you so why do you care?"

I find that to be a stupid reason and you admittedly have nothing else. 
Ok, I'll reword it for you, troll. Gay marriage should be allowed because it doesn't infringe on the rights of anyone else.
Animal cruelty laws.

Quite honestly, breeding cats to produce kittens and then crushing the kittens heads with a brick on your back porch doesn't infringe on the rights of anyone else.
Why is that against the law?
4/2/2013 11:06 AM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
I don't know. If you'd like to sue to make it legal, have at it.
4/2/2013 11:10 AM
tecwrg
Posts: 18996 (1)
Hall of Famer
4 1 153 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 10:23:00 AM (view original):
We should let them. Because marriage is important to them and it doesn't affect us either way.
If somebody wanted to marry their toaster oven, should we allow that?  Maybe marrying their toaster oven is important to that person, and It doesn't affect anybody else.
4/2/2013 11:14 AM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by tecwrg on 4/2/2013 11:14:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 4/2/2013 10:23:00 AM (view original):
We should let them. Because marriage is important to them and it doesn't affect us either way.
If somebody wanted to marry their toaster oven, should we allow that?  Maybe marrying their toaster oven is important to that person, and It doesn't affect anybody else.
Can a toaster enter into a legal contract? 
4/2/2013 11:16 AM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect

So "doesn't infringe on the rights of anyone else" really has no legal basis?

I assume not because ******* a corpse doesn't really infringe on rights but it's quite illegal.

4/2/2013 11:17 AM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 4/2/2013 11:17:00 AM (view original):

So "doesn't infringe on the rights of anyone else" really has no legal basis?

I assume not because ******* a corpse doesn't really infringe on rights but it's quite illegal.

You're a dumbshit troll, but I'm sure even you realize that there are other considerations, like the ability to contract, right?
4/2/2013 11:19 AM
◂ Prev 1...13|14|15|16|17...358 Next ▸
DOMA & Prop 8 Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.