DOMA & Prop 8 Topic

bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/11/2013 11:46:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/11/2013 11:19:00 AM (view original):
With respect to evolution, waiting until you are older to have kids is also not a desirable trait in terms of advancement.

But who cares?
Older parents can further the human race by reproducing.

Homosexuals cannot.

Are you missing something?
Nope. Do you think I'm missing something?
6/11/2013 12:01 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect

Why yes, I do.

I know you don't retain anything from page to page, or maybe even post to post, but tec's initial comment was that homosexuals can't procreate which indicated that full population homosexuality would end this world in 75-100 years.

Would the same hold true if everyone waited until their 30s to have children?

 

6/11/2013 12:12 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Posted by tecwrg on 6/10/2013 2:05:00 PM (view original):
How does evolution occur without procreation?

More to the point: how would Lance and Chuck have their own natural, genetic "love-child"?
Almost 24 hours ago.   I see how you forgot.
6/11/2013 12:19 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/11/2013 12:12:00 PM (view original):

Why yes, I do.

I know you don't retain anything from page to page, or maybe even post to post, but tec's initial comment was that homosexuals can't procreate which indicated that full population homosexuality would end this world in 75-100 years.

Would the same hold true if everyone waited until their 30s to have children?

 

But everyone isn't gay. So that's a moot point. It would be just as bad if everyone chose not to have kids, but we don't tell couples that choose not to have kids that they aren't ok.
6/11/2013 1:12 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Who said homosexuals aren't OK?    Are you a homophobe?
6/11/2013 1:14 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by tecwrg on 6/10/2013 7:53:00 PM (view original):
I'm not suggesting anything.  I'm just pointing out a fact about homosexuality in regards to why people might not agree with your statement at the bottom of p176 that "homosexuality is OK".

Apparently, it took three pages to make you understand that.  And I'm still not sure you do.
**** off now?
6/11/2013 1:25 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 152 32 129
Prospect
Progress in Human Evolution

1) Opposable thumbs - great idea, helps for building tools, advances the human species

2)  Standing erect - great idea, helps you see further, more opporunities to find food sources, advances the human species

3)  Homosexuality - umm . . . err . . . . hmm . . . ahhh . . .
6/11/2013 1:28 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
So you're back to, "it's not ok because it hurts evolution."
6/11/2013 1:31 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
The funny thing about this tec, is that you're disagreeing a question and not and opinion. I wasn't stating that homosexuality is ok, I was asking bis if he thought it was.
6/11/2013 1:33 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
I don't think he said any such thing.   You're the only one implying that homosexuals aren't OK.
6/11/2013 1:34 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/11/2013 1:34:00 PM (view original):
I don't think he said any such thing.   You're the only one implying that homosexuals aren't OK.
I quoted him.

He says "some people" might not agree that homosexuality is ok based on the fact that if everyone where to become homosexual, humans would become extinct.

The argument is stupid regardless of whether or not that's Tec's opinion or the opinion of "some people."
6/11/2013 1:36 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
It's stupid because a full population of homosexuals couldn't continue the species?
6/11/2013 1:38 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/11/2013 1:38:00 PM (view original):
It's stupid because a full population of homosexuals couldn't continue the species?
It's stupid because we don't have (and will never have) a full population of homosexuals.
6/11/2013 1:41 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 152 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 6/11/2013 1:41:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/11/2013 1:38:00 PM (view original):
It's stupid because a full population of homosexuals couldn't continue the species?
It's stupid because we don't have (and will never have) a full population of homosexuals.
Nostradumbass has spoken!
6/11/2013 1:43 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
"That's stupid.   Gays do not want to marry nor will they ever!!!!" - circa 30 years ago
6/11/2013 1:48 PM
◂ Prev 1...181|182|183|184|185...358 Next ▸
DOMA & Prop 8 Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.