Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 10:04:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/11/2013 5:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/11/2013 3:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/11/2013 3:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by burnsy483 on 7/11/2013 3:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/11/2013 3:05:00 PM (view original):
Really? 

This particular circumstance doesn't harm anyone, but he's said multiple times that because of the severity and how terrible the production of child porn is that all ownership should be illegal.

Also I think he's being a little vague to **** you off.

He's always a little vague when his argument is a FAILURE.

The entire point is that his "One Size Fits All" Big Three actually doesn't fit all or that he is severly lacking in morals.    He won't concede either so he'll repeat questions, disappear until the subject changes or just be vague.

I never said anything is one size fits all. In the case of gay marriage, there is no reasonable argument to ban it. Is there a reasonable argument to criminalize child porn possession?

So if "one size doesn't fit all" with respect to your Big Three, there must be a fourth (and possibly fifth, sixth, seventh, etc.) criteria that should be applied to each case.

Can you share what they are?

4) Doesn't include an activity that involves the raping of children.

We good now?

Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 9:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by genghisxcon on 7/12/2013 9:51:00 AM (view original):
I have to say I've lost all respect for tec in this thread. This is the same bullshit sophistry I've seen from miket before. Make some ludicrous apples-to-oranges comparison, rephrase what others say to distort meaning...and nearly 300 pages into the thread he's still hasn't produced a cogent argument against gay marriage.

Pathetic.

Sounds about right.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2013 10:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 9:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by genghisxcon on 7/12/2013 9:51:00 AM (view original):
I have to say I've lost all respect for tec in this thread. This is the same bullshit sophistry I've seen from miket before. Make some ludicrous apples-to-oranges comparison, rephrase what others say to distort meaning...and nearly 300 pages into the thread he's still hasn't produced a cogent argument against gay marriage.

Pathetic.

Sounds about right.

I sure hope tec can still sleep at night.    Because, without the respect of greghixon, it has to be tough.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2013 10:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 9:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by genghisxcon on 7/12/2013 9:51:00 AM (view original):
I have to say I've lost all respect for tec in this thread. This is the same bullshit sophistry I've seen from miket before. Make some ludicrous apples-to-oranges comparison, rephrase what others say to distort meaning...and nearly 300 pages into the thread he's still hasn't produced a cogent argument against gay marriage.

Pathetic.

Sounds about right.

I sure hope tec can still sleep at night.    Because, without the respect of greghixon, it has to be tough.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2013 10:28:00 AM (view original):
My wife wouldn't even speak to an insurance salesman.   In fact, everyone I know does their best to avoid you guys.