Posted by MikeT23 on 6/7/2013 10:58:00 AM (view original):
FWIW, I'm sure I'd veto a lot more trades. As I said earlier, it would be "pot sweetening" which is now done by including cash. A guy with 0/0 will always "sweeten the pot" by including his picks. Why shouldn't he?
This is one of these things that would DRASTICALLY alter the game for some. I'd probably go 0/0 HS/College and invest in IFA scouting then include all my picks in trades.
Yes. IMO, the guys who are 0/0 have an advantage. I would bottom those out and always trade my picks.
You also create a scenario where the rich can get richer. The guys who are getting 100 wins a year who have traded any valuable prospects they have can trade picks now. Seems off. I feel like you'd have more uncompetitive worlds from year to year.