Posted by colonels19 on 7/4/2013 12:18:00 AM (view original):
Posted by ike1024 on 7/3/2013 11:34:00 PM (view original):
Posted by colonels19 on 7/3/2013 4:04:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dahsdebater on 7/3/2013 3:31:00 PM (view original):
Colonels, most of what you said is stupid. For example, your continued insistence he should have kept recruiting.
A) he did
B) I probably wouldn't have; if CS is going to intervene, why would I waste more money on those guys instead of saving it to get 3 other recruits who can help me win?
He stopped for some time, waiting for seble to throw in the white towel for him, as referenced by the following ticket entry, which I've already posted...
7/2/2013 2:10 PM myfriend
otherguy just took the lead on Player 1 with his DIII school. He is already leading on Player 2 with his DII school, mostly because I am holding back money to see what you do.
As for B, recruiting isn't done in a vacuum...who's to say that someone else wasn't going to jump in at any point...what do you do then, give the first guy the recruit and let him keep the money? Ha...can you say slippery slope? You'd also have to look at the potential carryover cash involved as well when you're asking/BEGGING WIS to stop someone on your behalf. Again, you'll never catch me ******** if this happens to me.
Lastly, I don't care that you think I've regressed on here lately. I'm not perfect, and if I have something to say that I'm passionate about, then I'm going to pipe up. I'm nobody's puppet/crony....I don't need people to tell me what to do, say, or otherwise...post on my behalf, back me up, etc. In general, I think some people on this site are too soft and don't want to be accountable/responsible for their actions, and that's what gets to me from time to time...if I think you're trying to puss out on something, sure I'll take you to task about it. Wronoj starts a thread about something that's basically resolved/nearing resolution just to say "we're right, right?", looking for some ultimate blessing from the HD community to affirm their stance/situation, so they could point to something (the poll) when/in case Seble said "No". He wasn't vague because it was "in the works", he was vague because he was pitching his agenda/side of the story...everyone will say otherwise of course, but c'mon...plain as day...
It's great if that's how you justify being a stubborn douche, but it doesn't change your stubborn douchiness.
I'll try to keep this short and sweet because I feel like I'm just going to end up repeating myself. I don't like getting/being like this...wronoj posted a very one sided, evidence lacking, waiting for daddy to stop the fight gripe that was basically already resolved and he still wanted to fight about it. This thing was resolved before I made my first post, but that wasn't made clear until 3 hours later...he/you wanted the show and you got it. I resent the manner in which he and theeyetest played this thing out, because it was over before it started. In these situations/forum gripes, there's never an "I'm gonna win this anyway" mantra, and that's what gets me...the first inclination is to lay down...
Getting back to the "cheating" issue...unless I missed something, I could screw theeyetest just as bad and probably worse by taking a decent D3 team with a lot of open scholarships by waiting til he had who he wanted "considering" and just dump all my money on those guys to steal them away, just to **** him off/ruin his recruiting session/etc. That wouldn't be cheating but what stjmarsh did was...it's kind of laughable, because where is the intent more malicious...it's like, if you want to know what it's liked to get ****** in this game, I'll pony up $13 and show you, legally...
I have 2 teams in a world, so you understand where I stand on the situation before jumping on my statement, but I think you're missing the point that
the cheating was not as much about one guy using 2 teams to gang up on 1, but more about the fact that by using the 2 teams, he
has information about the battles that he otherwise would not have.
Under your scenario, you could get a team with a bunch of scholarships and take the 1 guy to screw him, but that means you dont care about this team and plan to leave it, but
if you are using these 2 teams and trying to win with both, you won't because then you will be left with a bunch of open scholarships.
In the end I agree that I would stop spending the money because you are throwing money at a battle that is impossible to win unless both sides were battling fairly.
I'm glad you feel passionate and are defending your stance and I agree that all the forum threads about cheating are getting lame, but right now you only sound like someone who was proven wrong and rather than just accept it and bow out, you get defensive instead.