you keep sitting on your high horse and talking down to me but you are a fool. you are angry bc my idea would solve many problems but you disagree with it personlly. you want to coddle everyone and hold their hand through some bs appeals process which is part of the problem to begin with - too much bs tied up in those kinds of thins. you can call yourself rebulican or the president of the universe for all i care but if you honestly believe the bs you spout then you are a fool. you can't even address my ponts you just talk down to me and try to insult me well YOU are the moron if you can't handle a discussion with some one who disgree with you without talking down like that. you want insults, then go **** yourself.
This is another ironic statement because you haven't made a legitimate good faith response to any of the legal hurdles I've posited. I've humored your ridiculous proposal with numerous intelligent criticisms (along with quite a bit of mockery, which you fully deserve) and you haven't really addressed any of them. Here's another one - what happens when your moralistic and practical justifications don't line up? What about married parents who don't have money? And single parents that do?
What if you have a good job, get pregnant, and then your company goes bankrupt and you're broke? You became pregnant in a totally responsible way at a responsible time, intentionally, but now you're in violation of the law and you and your child are due for execution. What happens here?
Finally, I want to specifically address the bolded section of text. A) I'm not angry. I kinda think you're funny. B) your idea would not solve problems, it would create problems. How has the one-child policy worked out in China? Lots of people get away with breaking that, and they only charge a fine. You think people can't dodge this? And investigations cost money. Enforcement costs money. Reforming welfare is a far cheaper alternative than executing mass murder of the populus. But finally, C) you're statement here is just 100% incompatible with a free society. We have jury trials and an appeals system for a reason - to protect the innocent and give the people protection against tyrannical government. You're advocating not only the erosion of civil liberties and protections but direct and obvious governmental tyranny. I disagree with your idea, and it has nothing to do with being Republican or anything else. It has everything to do with being a freedom-loving American. If you want a system like you advocate move to China, or Cuba, or sub-Saharan Africa. You can find the big tyrannical ruthless governments happy to kill of their own people in those places. But don't expect any proud American, or even disappointed American, to support those kinds of policies here.
You said that if I believe the BS I spew I'm a fool. BS like "people deserve rights and protections?" That same BS on which our country was founded? The same BS generations of Americans were willing to die to protect? If you think freedom is foolish, find a less free place to live. Don't expect your foolish BS to gain any traction here.