10/11/2013 5:30 PM
Posted by redwingscup on 10/11/2013 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jsakicno19 on 10/11/2013 5:59:00 AM (view original):
Posted by schwarze on 10/7/2013 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Can anybody confirm or deny that salaries for pre-2013 players remain the same as before?  Or were there any changes made?
Hello 'schwarze'... -Nice cyber-shovel, man... Your post,
buried by all these other posted replies... Apology 4 my
oversight of your duo of questions... Indeed some 1 did,
&, an affirmative that changes occur'd...

In my rush (things happen'd kwikly, --upon the release),
& w/ other usernames, eye opted 2 instead draft teams
of catchers, w/ Team No.# 1 having JMauer 'C' slot'd, @
the top... Those teams, 2 & 1/2 total, produced a Top-26
catchers 'sample-size', salary-wise, descending...

The 'lightning-bolt' of the new additions 2 the data-base,
had an immediate 2nd bolt upon glance @ JMauer's D-

Am eye overstating the normal light-bulbs in brain cells,
during 'idea-mode' ???... Blew a few bulbs with ALL that
thunder, from the constant ''wtf's'' that were exploding by
the second, with each glance @ the multiplying D-'s...

Cut 2 the chase... Perfect plan... Wi$ SiteMail... (U old fart)
Of all the people 2 ask me (?)... Had 2 be U... See ya'...
is there a Google site that I could copy the above into for an English translation? 
QUOTE : (1st 2 words)...

Hello 'schwarze'... (end of quote)

U read these 2 simple words, & look like an
absolute 'idiot' determining that it is meant
4 U 2 read, pronounce, & understand...

U don't need 'Google'... U don't need english.
Eye ain't convinced that U ain't helpless, -but,
U R... Beyond a shadow of a doubt...

U will get NO translation from me about what
"Hello 'schwarze' " really means in english...

& now there's 2 idiots who can't read... BYE !!!
10/11/2013 5:48 PM
Posted by jsakicno19 on 10/11/2013 5:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by skunk206 on 10/11/2013 5:03:00 PM (view original):
Not even Google could figure that out
Yeah, but --->>> U may have graduated kindergarten, but
when it came time 2 read & write, U could NOT write at all
unless U could read...

So, your teacher wasted the effort, when that teacher taught
U the fundamentals of reading... & everytime U struggled 2
read, as a young 1st-grader, the teacher taught U to simply
PRONOUNCE what U R trying 2 read... Then, it works...

If U can't read it, then pronounce instead... Useless to read
Japanese, if U can't pronounce Japanese... When all is said
& done, & U still can't read it, or pronounce it, THEN, --MOST
LIKELY THAT IT WAS NEVER MEANT 4 U...

Whack nuts, who can't read, or pronounce, ain't my problem.

U R = you are and 2 = to isn't exactly advanced U-boat encryption.

Let's go ahead and break it down though, for those whack nuts who ain't your problem...

"Hello 'schwarze'... -Nice cyber-shovel, man... Your post,
buried by all these other posted replies... Apology 4 my
oversight of your duo of questions... Indeed some 1 did,
&, an affirmative that changes occur'd...

In my rush (things happen'd kwikly, --upon the release),
& w/ other usernames, eye opted 2 instead draft teams
of catchers, w/ Team No.# 1 having JMauer 'C' slot'd, @
the top... Those teams, 2 & 1/2 total, produced a Top-26
catchers 'sample-size', salary-wise, descending...

The 'lightning-bolt' of the new additions 2 the data-base,
had an immediate 2nd bolt upon glance @ JMauer's D-

Am eye overstating the normal light-bulbs in brain cells,
during 'idea-mode' ???... Blew a few bulbs with ALL that
thunder, from the constant ''wtf's'' that were exploding by
the second, with each glance @ the multiplying D-'s...

Cut 2 the chase... Perfect plan... Wi$ SiteMail... (U old fart)
Of all the people 2 ask me (?)... Had 2 be U... See ya'..."

Hello, schwarze.  Nice cyber-shovel, man.  Your post, buried by all these other posted replies.  Apology for my oversight of your duo of questions.  Indeed someone did, and, an affirmative that changes occurred.  In my rush (things happened quickly, upon the release), and with other usernames, I opted to instead draft teams of catchers, with team number one having Joe Mauer 'C' slotted, at the top.  Those teams, two and a half total, produced a Top-26 catchers 'sample-size', salary-wise, descending.  The 'lightning-bolt' of the new additions to the database, had an immediate second bolt upon glance at Joe Mauer's D-.  Am I overstating the normal lightbulbs in brain cells, during 'idea mode'?  Blew a few bulbs with all that thunder, from the constant WTF's that were exploding by the second, with each glance at the multiplying D-'s.  Cut to the chase.  Perfect plan.  WIS Sitemail.  You old fart.  Of all the people to ask me?  Had to be you.  See you.

Even with the texting/internet shorthand removed, it makes no sense.  It's just a jumble of half-formed thoughts and fragments with random commas.  That's why people can't read it, not because 4 = for is beyond their kindergarten educations.
10/11/2013 5:57 PM
IMO, FTFY, FWIW
10/11/2013 7:18 PM
Posted by jsakicno19 on 10/4/2013 9:31:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Lazerhawks on 10/4/2013 9:17:00 PM (view original):
I sent a note to sim about the 2013 catchers all having a D- fielding rating. I'm sure it's a mistake that they will correct.
Correct me, should I be wrong here... -Seems to me that
a catcher's D- fielding rating, would also be reflected in a
lowered salary (?)...

In other words, if it's a mere forgivable 'modern-day' typo,
then of course, it would have no effect on the salary, even
if all catchers "ooops'd" into an A+ fielding rating (?)...
 
The calculations, that ultimately determine that season's
salary for any player, should reflect the fielder rating, too...

Are the salaries gonna' change, like when JMauer gets a
nice upgrade, from a D-, to whatever... Surely, he'd cost a
wee-bit more (?)...

We shall see, once those typo's are corrected, right ???...
SKUNK (Yes U)... U didn't read THIS quote, but 'schwarze' did...

'schwarze' asked 2 questions... Those questions are pinpoint'd
@ what happens IF >>>

1) ALL numbers on a players season totals, that lead 2 the final
SALARY for that player, but SALARY end totals change when any
player receives a defensive up-grade... All numbers stay as is...

2) 'schwarze's' question seeks the differential in salary re-fix's
ONLY after a D- is upgraded to a B-, or A+...

3) Eye know what 'schwarze' is seeking... Finally a 'window' in
which ACCURATE measurements regarding DEF ratings can
be made on ALL players... The worth of a D-, on a linear weight
that is finally in OUR hands...

Will definitely NOT share such w/ a blind SKUNK who cannot,
or will not make any attempts to TRULY understand...

Enjoy your estimates & guesses... This is break-thru stuff... &
it's ACCURATE, as all hell... Continue your hyper-illiteracy... 

10/11/2013 7:29 PM
Posted by schwarze on 10/7/2013 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Can anybody confirm or deny that salaries for pre-2013 players remain the same as before?  Or were there any changes made?
Those were schwarze's questions.  Read them again.
10/11/2013 7:35 PM
For the 1st time, we have the salary of JMauer as a D-minus
catcher in 2013...

Very shortly thereafter, ---we had a new 2013 JMauer with a
different defensive rating, & a different salary...

That (simply) is what is measureable, & anyone who copied
the initial release numbers, --benefitted-- for a very few short
moments, ---because WHEN the change occured, those first
numbers disappeared, across-the-board...

Again, was able 2 save 26 catchers, whose def ratings were
changed from the release, after the upgrade...

Those "before-&-after" numbers will be shared w/ 'schwarze'
solely because eye am convinced that U would not know how
to handle them, or measure them, or share them w/ the Wi$
baseball community here... Find another way to deal w/ it... 
10/11/2013 7:42 PM
Posted by skunk206 on 10/11/2013 7:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by schwarze on 10/7/2013 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Can anybody confirm or deny that salaries for pre-2013 players remain the same as before?  Or were there any changes made?
Those were schwarze's questions.  Read them again.
Seriously, read them again.
10/11/2013 9:36 PM
Those numbers show that (across-the-board) when measured
on an equal linear weight, that the single most influential effect
defensively is the arm... This also applies to OF's, & cut-off men,
but NOT in a pre-assumed manner... Rather, the arm is mainly
based upon whether the player is throwing RH'd, or LH'd...

Measured properly, as 'schwarze' would also do, ---it becomes
clear that this is what effects salaries, to the greatest degree...

It's not about plus + plays, or minus - plays... Those also vary
based on which arm a catcher or OF'r is throwing with...

Changing an entire fundamental approach to playing games
here @ Wi$, where we spend small $$$'s on a sound bench,
with NO consideration that, maybe, those $$$ would be best
spent on a great RH thrower, & a LH thrower, & actually be in
a better position to get better results, & more plus + plays...

Did eye reply to 'schwarze' by stating that eye had NO clue @
all, & couldn't understand his question ???... Nope...

'schwarze had results in this years tourney... Similarly, he is
VERY good @ establishing expectations of what the results
should be, & compares them to what they actually are...

This gives 'schwarze' REAL numbers... The 26 catchers that
were captured, prior to the revision... The exact SAME applies
when analyzing ANY player... The arm has the most value...

Am done w/ U --- Mr. Skunk... If U R guessing that it is so very
possible that 1 lone season can have such an impact on any
previously completed season in the database, well, that's a
a problem for your brain cell Doctor... Simply not my prob... 
10/11/2013 11:50 PM
Posted by skunk206 on 10/11/2013 7:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by skunk206 on 10/11/2013 7:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by schwarze on 10/7/2013 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Can anybody confirm or deny that salaries for pre-2013 players remain the same as before?  Or were there any changes made?
Those were schwarze's questions.  Read them again.
Seriously, read them again.
Posted by schwarze on 10/7/2013 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Can anybody confirm or deny that salaries for PRE-2013 players remain the same as before?  Or were there any changes made?
                                                                     ^
                                                                  That
10/12/2013 5:15 PM
Posted by skunk206 on 10/11/2013 11:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by skunk206 on 10/11/2013 7:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by skunk206 on 10/11/2013 7:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by schwarze on 10/7/2013 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Can anybody confirm or deny that salaries for pre-2013 players remain the same as before?  Or were there any changes made?
Those were schwarze's questions.  Read them again.
Seriously, read them again.
Posted by schwarze on 10/7/2013 7:54:00 PM (view original):
Can anybody confirm or deny that salaries for PRE-2013 players remain the same as before?  Or were there any changes made?
                                                                     ^
                                                                  That
Excuse me, for a moment, but it's "whack-nut" time again...

A "whack-nut" comes into a baseball thread, & turns it into
several grammar lessons, & doesn't EVER get the notion
that he is vainly trying to accomplish this w/ a clearly, very,
very UN-cooperative individual... Who does that ???...

A "whack-nut" comes into a baseball thread, so TOTALLY
filled with unforgiveness for what offends the "whack-nut".
& equally SO bent on a future full of a playground of LOL's
where his new career is typing "Laugh out loud" all OVER
every Forum, here @ Wi$...

A "whack-nut" comes into a baseball thread, w/ so many
pages already filled w/ posts, already late, making ZERO
attempts to apply grammar lessons on previous pages,
& still goes OFF-topic, demanding this is a "GRAMMAR"
lesson thread, time-&-time again...

A "whack-nut" comes into a baseball thread, -& THINKS
that in the rush of the new 2013 release,- where every 1
is gawking @ the new players, that some 1 actually took
the time to scan some 100+ seasons already in the data
base, to see if there were any changes made... Nope, as
eye don't interpret like an off-topic "whack-nut", nor would
eye ever believe 'schwarze' is scanning the community in
search of such an arduous & ponderous task, in all-scan
mode... A Japanese translator could teach a "whack-nut"
grammar-lesson giver a whole fRiGG'n LoTsA bUnChA'
stuff, --->>>couldn't he ???...

A "whack-nut" comes into a baseball thread, CONvinced
that he must dominate a baseball thread w/ "GRAMMAR"
lesson's, with all of the "overwhelming" interpretive skills
of a punk sKuNk, ---who cannot even smell how horribly
he is stinking-up a baseball thread... Can he, or can't he?

0K, riddler skunk, ya' got me... Will confess my single most
heavily-weighted reason is that 'schwarze' is kewl. U ain't...

C'mon now... Is 'schwarze' pranking me, or R U serious ?...
10/12/2013 5:23 PM
Lemme' guess... Did ''schwarze' promise to 'bump'
U up a notch on the wait-list for the 2019 tourney ? 
10/12/2013 5:43 PM
Hello All,

This is the wife of the man who typed about this being a baseball thread. I honestly believe that skunk206 would score alot more affection from amycox. With his dominating prowess in the well educated grammar department. His skills would drive amycox crazy. I am jealous that you like my husband. How he ever got your attention, I can assure you that he is a man who does not need you in the same way that amycox needs you.

Thank you all, very much,
The wife
10/12/2013 8:39 PM
WTF???
10/12/2013 9:55 PM
I'm lost now -- any ways... 

Yasiel Puig -D+/D+??   
10/12/2013 10:07 PM (edited)
Nope... 

The "Wiki' flurry had 2 end on the 1st page...
2chair is hiding 84champs in his attic...

No worry... The house is un-marked... -BUT
U will have to forward your request to 2chair.

84champs will get your request on YPuig,,,
of 6

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999-2014 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.