Posted by damauler12 on 10/7/2013 12:55:00 PM (view original):
#2 AINEC.
When I evaluate QB's it's...Tech>>>GI>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Str/Ath.
Now throw in he's a Fresh who will get better....
I'm assuming AINEC means "and it's not even close." Lol...sorry, don't know that lingo.
So I'm curious Damauler, how is it not close? I ran some numbers on excel just for fun and I cannot come up with a formula where it's not close using your evaluation criteria. Even if you did Tech only there's only a 4 point difference. That's not close? Even an avg of just Tech and GI is 71.5 each. Below are some formula's I put together to illustrate that it is close unless you disregard Str or Athl but you clearly rank Str and Athl close to equal.
|
Athl |
Str |
GI |
Tech |
Avg |
Tech / GI Weighting |
Damauler Formula |
Tech/GI/Athl/No Str |
My Formula |
Tech / GI Only |
QB 1 |
71 |
71 |
68 |
75 |
71.25 |
71.4 |
71.95 |
72.1 |
71.35 |
71.5 |
QB 2 |
82 |
52 |
64 |
79 |
69.25 |
70.6 |
71.2 |
75.1 |
68.65 |
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tech / GI Heavey weighting: (Tech *.04)+(GI*.4)+(Ath*.1)*(Str*.1) |
|
|
Damauler Formula: (Tech*.5)+(GI*.35)+(Str*.1)+(Athl*.05) |
|
|
|
Tech/GI/Athl/No Str: (Tech*.5)+(GI*.3)+(Athl*.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escobar |
60 |
46 |
88 |
88 |
70.5 |
81 |
82.4 |
82.4 |
76.8 |
88 |
Cunningham |
62 |
63 |
80 |
91 |
74 |
80.9 |
82.9 |
81.9 |
78.65 |
85.5 |
So who are you starting at Texas? Escobar or Cunningham?