Posted by ybjsports on 5/5/2014 3:54:00 PM (view original):
Posted by contrarian23 on 5/5/2014 2:48:00 PM (view original):
Jake Daubert
will be interested to see how he does, was on my short list
The short answer is...disappointing. For a player whom I thought would normalize very well, especially for average, his contributions to my already meager offenses have been very limited:
80M
I used 1914 (RL: .329/.375/.432)
.303/.353/.390
OPS is 84 points lower than RL
90M
I used 1918 (RL: .308/.360/.429)
.287/.332/.368
OPS is 89 points lower than RL
100M
I used 1913 (RL: .350/.405/.423)
.305/.346/.349
OPS is 133 points lower than RL
110M
I used 1912 (RL: 308/.369/.415)
.245/.303/.295
OPS is 186 points lower than RL
120M
I used 1922 (RL: .336/.395/.492)
.269/.307/.336
OPS is 244 points below RL
All in all, Daubert was probably the worst in a series of poor selections I made. The 100M season particularly disappointed me. Given his RL .350 average in a year that should have normalized very well, and a +1 park for singles, I expected him to hit for a much better average. Among the players who are significantly outhitting him are 1969 Clemente, 1950 Goodman, 1987 Mattingly, 1995 Piazza.