Random 5 (47 mil.) - (14 in) Revised Topic

Briber's team is:

PG. Nets 05-06
SG. Nets 04-05
SF. Pistons 75-76
PF. Lakers 95-96
C. Celtics 85-86
7/24/2014 9:47 PM
A couple of teams have the same teams with close seasons/positions. Not Good!
7/24/2014 9:49 PM
I went by your list but there isn't a 69 Pipers or 56 Royals?
7/24/2014 10:00 PM (edited)
does the "no clones" rule apply between seasons?  there's a ton of overlap with those nets teams that would force me to use a guy or two twice to field a competitive team
7/24/2014 10:02 PM
Posted by brider212 on 7/24/2014 10:02:00 PM (view original):
does the "no clones" rule apply between seasons?  there's a ton of overlap with those nets teams that would force me to use a guy or two twice to field a competitive team
Yeah, I'm not sure what we are going to do about that one yet.
7/24/2014 10:06 PM
Posted by brider212 on 7/24/2014 10:02:00 PM (view original):
does the "no clones" rule apply between seasons?  there's a ton of overlap with those nets teams that would force me to use a guy or two twice to field a competitive team
You can definitely field a great team without using clones. Your team is loaded. If you want a redraw I will gladly do so for you.
7/24/2014 11:05 PM
Sorry I just got back to my CPU. Long day lol I'm up for whatever challenge lies ahead lol
7/25/2014 1:33 AM
Posted by snydpie on 7/24/2014 11:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by brider212 on 7/24/2014 10:02:00 PM (view original):
does the "no clones" rule apply between seasons?  there's a ton of overlap with those nets teams that would force me to use a guy or two twice to field a competitive team
You can definitely field a great team without using clones. Your team is loaded. If you want a redraw I will gladly do so for you.
Certainly has some good players but dunno if I would say loaded, will have to judge how they stack up against some other pairings.

Here's my issue:  the 05-06 Nets team for my PG's has 5 player options.  But 4 of those options are already part of my SG possibilities from the other Nets year.  If I want to use the earlier versions of those players, I'm only getting one possible PG from that draw while most of the other teams in the league will have the full position rosters to choose from without players being restricted.

I think given the random nature of the league, it would keep with the spirit of the theme to have access to all the options of the draw (to include potential clones from different years).  Not trying to raise a big stink, but think it's worth considering.
7/25/2014 1:54 AM
And with all that said, still would like to grab a 2nd team (not a redraft)!
7/25/2014 1:55 AM
Posted by snydpie on 7/24/2014 10:03:00 PM (view original):
Shawbigred's team is:

PG. T-Wolves 90-91
SG. Hornets 91-92
SF. T-Wolves 12-13
PF. Hawks 53-54
C. Hawks 92-93
I'll be the first to request the re-draw. Fingers crossed it's not worse.
7/25/2014 6:19 AM
Posted by snydpie on 7/24/2014 9:44:00 PM (view original):
Eleibowitz's team is:

PG. Celtics 69-70
SG. Spurs 12-13
SF. Spurs 83-84
PF. Kings 81-82
C. Rockets 01-02
You already knew this snydpie redraw! lol.  
7/25/2014 7:32 AM
Posted by eleibowitz on 7/25/2014 7:32:00 AM (view original):
Posted by snydpie on 7/24/2014 9:44:00 PM (view original):
Eleibowitz's team is:

PG. Celtics 69-70
SG. Spurs 12-13
SF. Spurs 83-84
PF. Kings 81-82
C. Rockets 01-02
You already knew this snydpie redraw! lol.  
Hey, that isn't too bad.  Would have been the second best draw last time around.  I would say the list is working.

That being said, I think this draw doesn't suck (those Spurs teams should provide a number of good players).  So if your next one does it is kind of not that fun if people just quit after the second draw.
7/25/2014 8:10 AM
I would say allow clones.
7/25/2014 8:11 AM
I know we already started, but why not just give people two draws straight away and let them pick one to avoid people getting stuck.  Or remove the restriction where they can't go back or something.  I don't want to see people quit.
7/25/2014 8:12 AM
Posted by snydpie on 7/24/2014 10:00:00 PM (view original):
I went by your list but there isn't a 69 Pipers or 56 Royals?
1969/70 Pittsburgh Pipers (moved from Minnesota)

1956/57 Rochester Royals
7/25/2014 8:14 AM
◂ Prev 1...7|8|9|10|11|12 Next ▸
Random 5 (47 mil.) - (14 in) Revised Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.