Posted by chargingryno on 4/17/2023 7:39:00 PM (view original):
Posted by redcped on 4/17/2023 5:49:00 PM (view original):
Your points are valid, which is why we used the words "to minimize the chances." We're trying to reduce the likelihood of a team that wins 30-40 games and throws off competitive balance. Keep in mind many owners never play caps this low.
Then my question would be, why only the $70m league? Imo the $70 is the league owners could best use a strategy of lower IP and succeed without fatigue issues. The chances of a team going into a death spiral are probably most likely in the $100m-$120m leagues. Heck, the worst fatigue I’ve ever had in the WISC was from a league that had mostly $200m rosters. If the reason for the minimum is to prevent a death spiral, why not apply a minimum IP pitched for all leagues?
Last year in the two lowest cap leagues, $70 & $80m themes, there were 5 teams that finished with less than 50 wins, Two with less than 30 wins.
In the two highest cap leagues, $120m & $140m themes, there were 7 teams that finished with less than 50 wins, three with less than 30 wins (and even one with 5 wins).
In 2021, the 3 lowest Themes had 6 teams with less than 50 wins and the 3 highest had 5 teams with less than 50.
In 2020, the 3 lowest themes had 6 teams finish with less than 50 wins, the 3 higher cap themes finished with 7.
So, my thoughts are if the goal is to prevent those types of teams from ruining the competitive balance, it seems the higher caps are a bigger issue, if not equal, to the lower caps.
4/17/2023 8:20 PM (edited)