Thanks as always, France. On the plus side, Leet's 1 SPD is "sky's the limit", so it might end up at 10...

"Simpson...I like the cut of his jib." Good stuff, France.

My team has more talented players this season, but they are mostly just scorers. The 3 seniors from last season were not flashy, but they filled in all of the cracks for Hood, like utility infielders and middle relievers. I need a couple of those guys. Either the SG with REB and ST or a PF with a flatter profile and ST.

Andrew, when you say, "There probably isn't enough ATL to make a real NT run," - are you saying I likely won't win any games in the NT, or are you saying I likely won't even make the NT?  

And then to clarify, I actually redshirted one of my senior 95+ rebounders, so I only have one graduating and two returning. I'm trying to uneven out my class sizes and consolidate down to 2 or 3 years of Seniors and Juniors. Same reason I left the scholly unfilled - to help with the unevening of class sizes. Because after missing the NT for six seasons so far, I've realized this South division is just way way way too brutal to compete at a C- prestige. I think this is probably my best chance of starting the virtuous cycle of winning some games, getting my prestige up a bit, recruiting better players, winning some more games, etc. 

he meant "make a run once you get to the NT". otherwise, you are all on the right track. prestige is king, as is eventual class evenness, but you have put yourself in a good position going forward. nicely done. (nc2457829305)

Magneto, hadn't noticed the RS.  Interesting stuff.
Wrono is right on the other comment.  Much like his and my SPD will limit our tourney runs, you'd have to get some fortunate matchups to get too far with that ATH.

	ATH	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT
Noggle Then	59	26	45	41	30	44	27	18	25	56	58	67	B-	496
Noggle Now	62	49	61	68	51	91	71	26	34	74	84	90	B-	761
	3	23	16	27	21	47	44	8	9	18	26	23		265

The ratings behind The Legend.

York Tracking

Player Ratings
Name Yr. Pos. A SPD REB DE BLK LP PE BH P WE ST DU FT TOT
Alfred Brennen Jr. PG 62 85 2 61 13 24 74 78 62 67 90 86 C+ 704
Scott Gilland Jr. PG 54 86 1 57 3 1 78 86 82 58 83 73 B 662
Johnny Kelly So. PG 47 80 7 33 2 5 76 67 54 13 74 48 C 506
Darren Lawrence Sr. SG 26 67 18 47 17 15 90 64 79 81 85 22 B+ 611
John James Fr. SG 32 59 27 39 20 13 33 47 34 74 77 71 C 526
Glen Woolridge Jr. SF 62 53 34 42 34 62 59 48 46 47 75 45 B- 607
Phillip Morisky Fr. SF 58 60 22 44 14 17 59 41 58 36 76 57 C+ 542
Charles Adams Fr. PF 46 34 53 35 43 24 30 22 22 70 75 60 C+ 514
David Jones Sr. C 43 27 92 35 86 74 9 1 30 36 75 58 C+ 566
Andy Kopec So. C 47 22 73 27 74 78 2 31 26 55 80 44 C+ 559
Kenneth Williams So. C 41 26 94 39 80 94 1 1 32 56 82 66 B- 612
Don Joyce Fr. C 43 13 79 35 66 48 1 21 1 72 79 61 C 519
Averages - - 47 51 42 41 38 38 43 42 44 55 79 58 - 577

The formula speaks!  It shares my skepticism at getting enough W's to get CUA into the dance...
I don't have a South/North balance adjustment which would matter this year. 

School	Beg. Yr. Avg.	# Seniors	# Juniors	Players >600	Player >500	Top 3 REB	Form. Wins	Form. Losses
Salisbury	517	4	3	1	7	76	5	11
CUA	530	2	2	3	5	90	6	10
Gallaudet	546	5	4	2	8	87	11	5
Goucher	493	2	3	0	6	86	1	15
MW	515	2	2	0	7	92	3	13
Marymount	546	3	3	2	8	86	9	7
York	580	3	3	4	9	86	15	1
Baptist	538	5	5	0	9	75	8	8
Hood	532	3	2	3	8	74	7	9
Chestnut	512	2	3	2	5	93	4	12
VJ	555	3	5	6	7	90	14	2
SMM	558	4	3	4	9	87	13	3
Average	535	3	3	2.3	7	85	96	96

North

Scoring By Position							Scoring By Class
		#	PPG	% Dis	3PG		Class	Points		Rebs
Salisbury	G	11	31.4	49%	5.0		Fr.	5.3	8%	5.5	18%
Salisbury	SF	11	6.8	11%	0.5		So.	6.1	10%	1.1	4%
Salisbury	Big	11	25.9	40%	0.2		Jr.	18.3	29%	10.8	35%
	Total		64.1		5.7		Sr.	34.5	54%	13.3	43%
CUA	G	11	29.2	43%	6.2		Fr.	4.2	6%	4.5	14%
CUA	SF	11	15.1	22%	0.6		So.	16.5	25%	10.8	33%
CUA	Big	11	23.1	34%	-		Jr.	15.5	23%	11.4	35%
	Total		67.4		6.8		Sr.	31.2	46%	5.7	18%
Gallaudet	G	11	24.9	32%	2.4		Fr.	2.5	3%	0.6	2%
Gallaudet	SF	11	17.5	22%	0.7		So.	3.4	4%	1.0	3%
Gallaudet	Big	11	36.0	46%	0.1		Jr.	20.3	26%	17.5	48%
	Total		78.5		3.2		Sr.	52.4	67%	17.5	48%
Goucher	G	11	27.7	43%	4.7		Fr.	12.1	19%	5.5	16%
Goucher	SF	11	7.5	12%	-		So.	11.5	18%	4.2	12%
Goucher	Big	11	29.2	45%	-		Jr.	24.1	37%	18.5	54%
	Total		64.5		4.7		Sr.	16.8	26%	5.9	17%
MW	G	11	32.7	44%	8.5		Fr.	2.0	3%	2.2	6%
MW	SF	11	14.1	19%	1.5		So.	33.7	46%	10.4	28%
MW	Big	11	27.2	37%	0.1		Jr.	18.5	25%	5.8	16%
	Total		74.0		10.0		Sr.	19.8	27%	19.1	51%
Marymount	G	11	40.5	53%	9.5		Fr.	4.1	5%	4.7	12%
Marymount	SF	11	14.1	18%	-		So.	10.9	14%	7.0	17%
Marymount	Big	11	21.6	28%	0.1		Jr.	36.7	48%	8.9	22%
	Total		76.2		9.5		Sr.	24.5	32%	20.4	50%

South

Scoring By Position							Scoring By Class
		#	PPG	% Dis	3PG		Class	Points		Rebs
York	G	11	38.7	47%	5.9		Fr.	2.8	3%	2.5	7%
York	SF	11	14.6	18%	0.7		So.	9.3	11%	12.5	34%
York	Big	11	28.7	35%	-		Jr.	30.0	37%	15.5	42%
	Total		82.1		6.6		Sr.	40.0	49%	6.0	16%
Baptist	G	11	38.9	45%	2.0		Fr.	6.5	7%	0.6	2%
Baptist	SF	11	12.8	15%	0.1		So.	3.5	4%	4.0	10%
Baptist	Big	11	35.4	41%	0.3		Jr.	39.7	46%	14.3	36%
	Total		87.1		2.4		Sr.	37.5	43%	20.7	52%
Hood	G	11	37.5	47%	5.5		Fr.	4.7	6%	7.7	24%
Hood	SF	11	7.5	9%	0.5		So.	13.1	16%	6.8	21%
Hood	Big	11	34.5	43%	-		Jr.	21.0	26%	8.3	26%
	Total		79.5		6.0		Sr.	40.7	51%	9.3	29%
Chestnut	G	11	34.8	45%	3.2		Fr.	10.8	14%	3.9	11%
Chestnut	SF	11	3.5	4%	0.3		So.	13.9	18%	8.8	26%
Chestnut	Big	11	38.8	50%	-		Jr.	24.5	32%	10.7	31%
	Total		77.1		3.5		Sr.	27.8	36%	10.6	31%
VJ	G	11	33.1	46%	5.6		Fr.	0.8	1%	1.9	6%
VJ	SF	11	4.3	6%	0.9		So.	-	0%	-	0%
VJ	Big	11	34.1	48%	-		Jr.	42.4	59%	12.3	36%
	Total		71.5		6.5		Sr.	28.3	40%	20.0	59%
SMM	G	11	46.1	57%	11.2		Fr.	-	0%	-	0%
SMM	SF	11	10.5	13%	0.9		So.	12.6	15%	9.6	24%
SMM	Big	11	25.0	31%	-		Jr.	21.8	27%	14.1	35%
	Total		81.5		12.1		Sr.	47.1	58%	16.0	40%

North

	Scoring Leaders					Other Stats
				PPA				Est Off %	Est Def %
Salisbury	Leading scorer:		G. Cook	1.08		REB %:		26%	67%
Salisbury	2nd leading scorer:		J. Cochran	0.94		Ast/TO Ratio:		0.5 to 1
Salisbury	3rd leading scorer:		D. Cummings	1.04		Turnover Ratio:		1.03 to 1
	Team:			1.02
CUA	Leading scorer:		G. McClimans	1.37		REB %:		30%	70%
CUA	2nd leading scorer:		K. Robinson	1.22		Ast/TO Ratio:		0.74 to 1
CUA	3rd leading scorer:		G. Khan	0.96		Turnover Ratio:		1.25 to 1
	Team:			1.15
Gallaudet	Leading scorer:		R. Belli	1.21		REB %:		29%	74%
Gallaudet	2nd leading scorer:		M. Perry	1.21		Ast/TO Ratio:		0.88 to 1
Gallaudet	3rd leading scorer:		M. English	1.26		Turnover Ratio:		0.79 to 1
	Team:			1.16
Goucher	Leading scorer:		E. Shepard	1.12		REB %:		26%	67%
Goucher	2nd leading scorer:		H. Cook	1.17		Ast/TO Ratio:		0.86 to 1
Goucher	3rd leading scorer:		R. Grimaldi	1.09		Turnover Ratio:		1.12 to 1
	Team:			1.08
MW	Leading scorer:		J. Callaway	1.23		REB %:		34%	71%
MW	2nd leading scorer:		D. Russell	1.10		Ast/TO Ratio:		0.96 to 1
MW	3rd leading scorer:		M. Carter	1.16		Turnover Ratio:		1.06 to 1
	Team:			1.17
Marymount	Leading scorer:		F. Brown	1.12		REB %:		33%	73%
Marymount	2nd leading scorer:		F. Barnhardt	1.26		Ast/TO Ratio:		0.91 to 1
Marymount	3rd leading scorer:		N. Toomer	1.25		Turnover Ratio:		1.09 to 1
	Team:			1.12

South

	Scoring Leaders					Other Stats
				PPA				Est Off %	Est Def %
York	Leading scorer:		A. Brennen	1.13		REB %:		29%	70%
York	2nd leading scorer:		K. Williams	1.15		Ast/TO Ratio:		1.36 to 1
York	3rd leading scorer:		S. Gilland	1.26		Turnover Ratio:		0.65 to 1
	Team:			1.15
Baptist	Leading scorer:		M. Cote	1.22		REB %:		24%	68%
Baptist	2nd leading scorer:		J. Leatherwood	1.16		Ast/TO Ratio:		0.7 to 1
Baptist	3rd leading scorer:		M. Parsons	1.22		Turnover Ratio:		1 to 1
	Team:			1.02
Hood	Leading scorer:		R. Smith	1.23		REB %:		24%	65%
Hood	2nd leading scorer:		R. Ewing	1.19		Ast/TO Ratio:		0.96 to 1
Hood	3rd leading scorer:		J. Ohler	1.13		Turnover Ratio:		1 to 1
	Team:			1.13
Chestnut	Leading scorer:		C. Wise	1.11		REB %:		29%	71%
Chestnut	2nd leading scorer:		C. McFarland	1.20		Ast/TO Ratio:		1.16 to 1
Chestnut	3rd leading scorer:		H. Grider	1.10		Turnover Ratio:		0.85 to 1
	Team:			1.10
VJ	Leading scorer:		M. Taylor	1.15		REB %:		33%	72%
VJ	2nd leading scorer:		A. McVay	1.15		Ast/TO Ratio:		1.11 to 1
VJ	3rd leading scorer:		D. Peck	1.09		Turnover Ratio:		1.11 to 1
	Team:			1.12
SMM	Leading scorer:		F. Switzer	1.48		REB %:		37%	75%
SMM	2nd leading scorer:		R. Legere	1.28		Ast/TO Ratio:		1.47 to 1
SMM	3rd leading scorer:		K. Simpson	1.19		Turnover Ratio:		0.97 to 1
	Team:			1.27

North Improvement Summaries
CUA

			Improvement													Current Status
Name	Yr.	Pos.	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	TOT	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT
Mark Cutts	So.	PG	0	15	-1	6	1	1	12	8	9	4	10	0	71	34	74	4	16	2	22	76	62	49	43	72	51	B+
Daniel Burton	Fr.	PG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	50	53	1	42	1	1	25	46	34	63	77	23	C
Ryan Krouse	Fr.	PG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	34	67	3	35	2	1	44	57	60	61	74	26	A-
Gary McClimans	Sr.	SG	1	1	0	2	1	27	3	1	7	5	2	0	50	22	67	10	25	3	40	100	68	68	85	75	41	B-
Billy Hollon	So.	SG	8	6	-1	7	5	4	11	7	10	4	8	4	73	69	60	21	67	11	20	55	51	39	48	79	45	B
Kenneth Robinson	Sr.	SF	0	6	5	4	6	9	27	3	10	5	4	0	79	31	61	54	57	34	83	61	47	37	66	88	75	B-
Franklyn Robert	Fr.	SF	3	8	6	4	4	4	6	4	-1	1	1	11	51	27	49	39	43	17	17	19	47	49	43	79	70	C+
Eric Jessie	Jr.	C	10	4	9	5	10	7	-1	3	-1	5	7	3	61	67	20	89	58	80	47	1	11	1	38	67	51	C+
Gus Khan	Jr.	C	8	3	7	2	5	20	6	0	1	9	4	12	77	33	35	99	24	85	80	24	21	8	66	83	63	C+
Thomas Korte	So.	C	3	9	3	8	4	0	2	1	-2	3	5	0	36	49	31	71	43	61	71	3	30	4	41	60	34	C
Allen Roush	So.	C	6	6	5	3	0	17	1	-1	-2	1	7	9	52	44	15	81	20	66	51	2	15	29	37	53	84	C+
Todd Spears	Fr.	C	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	35	27	72	25	60	47	4	13	4	52	63	61	D+

10-8, RPI 49.  Yuck.  The bad news is that the two impact players on this team are SRs.  The really bad news is that while Cutts and the Jessie/Khan pairing are passable, there is no apparent future impact player on this roster.  Worth noting is the poor ST of the bigs (necessitating carrying 5 on the active roster) and the good BLK and REB of the returning starters for next year.  The FR are, at least, interesting.  Burton hopes to skate by with his SPD/ATH combo; he's high in PE/P, so he should be able to get to Hollon levels in a year or two.  Krouse ("I can hear you!") was brought in for his ability to immediately contribute with his 60+ PE and P.  He doesn't have much upside, only BH coming in high.  Todd Spears, on top of his obvious attributes as a big man, has a nice WE to help him out.  His ST hasn't improved as much as some would hope, given the role he plays.

Gallaudet

			Improvement													Current Status
Name	Yr.	Pos.	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	TOT	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT
Dale Jenkins	Sr.	PG	0	2	0	5	1	3	0	3	5	2	1	4	26	55	73	1	67	4	23	35	64	61	33	66	49	C+
Vaughn Richards	Sr.	PG	1	8	0	2	0	0	7	11	9	5	3	1	47	46	71	1	44	2	2	68	63	57	40	74	88	C+
Henry Sauve	Sr.	PG	1	6	-1	1	2	0	0	11	5	10	-1	0	34	43	87	1	50	6	2	39	84	77	54	74	35	B-
Billy Anderson	Fr.	PG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	36	60	1	41	1	1	39	57	54	40	58	61	C-
Brandon Kirkpatrick	Fr.	PG	3	4	0	7	1	0	1	7	7	1	1	4	36	41	56	1	45	2	1	63	55	39	23	69	39	B
Marvin Perry	Sr.	SF	2	8	1	4	6	8	13	0	-1	10	5	4	60	74	55	40	68	27	76	36	28	5	46	90	53	B
David Milliken	So.	SF	10	10	2	4	6	0	2	3	17	1	4	12	71	59	58	27	57	13	7	53	34	46	57	74	51	B-
Bryan Beck	Jr.	PF	8	5	8	4	5	15	4	-2	0	2	2	4	55	50	25	71	40	60	74	39	2	1	40	79	65	B-
Robert Belli	Sr.	C	0	4	8	5	5	12	2	6	0	9	5	0	56	59	32	95	77	72	99	3	20	2	70	81	53	B+
Michael English	Jr.	C	6	0	7	0	6	14	0	-1	0	10	3	5	50	65	21	91	56	70	94	1	3	14	65	83	98	B-
John Venegas	Jr.	C	1	0	11	7	9	23	0	-1	-2	1	0	5	54	47	23	74	67	70	57	6	24	2	34	68	74	C-
Darrell Wysong	Jr.	C	1	4	2	5	2	8	0	-2	0	-3	8	4	29	63	24	66	70	48	57	1	2	1	27	63	64	C+

16-2, RPI 6, ranked #8.  Make no mistake, this team was designed for a run this year, and a run it will make.  There is enough SPD/ATH here to make eyetest take note, even.  Two 90/90 bigs and solid BH/P make for a formidible squad to handle on the boards or the TO margin.  The future looks ok in the front court with Venegas progressing nicely and English sticking around for one more.  The FR G's look ok to help a nice front line to the tourney; there should be room for a line about what good does it do you to have a phone call and high potential PE, Mr Anderson, if you can even hear?  But that would be just tacky.


Salisbury

			Improvement													Current Status
Name	Yr.	Pos.	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	TOT	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT
Jeremy Cochran	Sr.	PG	3	5	6	4	2	-1	3	9	5	6	-1	7	48	38	79	12	44	7	1	48	74	42	52	78	80	B-
Manuel Oyola	Jr.	PG	3	6	0	7	1	-1	15	0	2	3	1	2	39	39	68	1	45	4	3	72	60	41	46	83	72	A
Michael Griffin	Fr.	PG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	51	32	8	54	1	17	43	27	12	67	89	34	B-
David Cummings	Sr.	SG	2	5	1	4	1	14	5	6	1	9	8	3	59	38	73	15	43	13	25	52	58	33	66	89	72	B
Denis Brown	So.	SG	1	4	0	3	1	-1	7	7	8	2	-1	9	40	22	36	1	42	2	9	67	40	33	35	84	76	C
David Trollinger	So.	SG	7	0	-1	5	1	0	17	9	6	2	10	19	75	68	52	6	56	2	30	44	43	62	54	59	54	C
Nole Murphy	Jr.	SF	5	8	6	2	2	12	3	3	12	8	-1	6	66	47	59	50	32	28	29	42	45	24	68	77	42	B-
Brian Bell	Sr.	PF	4	4	7	3	3	8	-2	3	1	1	0	2	34	25	33	70	35	59	77	6	34	23	27	68	79	B-
Gavin Cook	Sr.	PF	4	0	0	6	2	0	1	10	11	4	2	-1	39	42	37	57	41	65	50	2	52	24	90	93	62	B
John Stone	Jr.	C	3	1	12	2	5	12	10	0	0	6	-1	2	52	28	15	89	26	62	66	40	21	9	61	75	64	C+
Danny Gravley	Fr.	C	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	8	12	69	9	65	53	27	17	9	49	74	61	C-
Cecil Mayes	Fr.	C	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	38	8	59	34	40	37	8	20	13	39	66	66	C+

2-17, RPI 205.  Salisbury's fate this year is the biproduct of aggressive scheduling and bad luck.  If you look at their recorded TO differential, REB differential, and even point differential, you'd imagine a team a couple of games under .500, not wallowing with only 2 W's.  The sum of the parts is not tourney quality, but certainly able to win against tourney teams.  Sure, it lacks a second +70 REB and second guy with +50 SPD and PE, but there is good team speed and defensive ratings.  Looking to next year, I like the Trollinger/Oyola backcourt, Murphy SF, and can believe that Stone with one of the FR bigs will work as a nice starting 5.  Griffin is deficient on SPD/BH/P but it is that skill set improvement that seems blaked into his profile.  Mayes is probably the big to hold hope for since Gravley's ATH/SPD prognosis is... well... grave.  Cecil has picked up enough REB and LP this year to wishcast a brighter future than merely a Sideshow clown.

Goucher

			Improvement													Current Status
Name	Yr.	Pos.	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	TOT	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT
Henry Cook	Sr.	PG	0	0	0	0	2	1	16	4	0	9	11	0	48	36	61	1	25	5	2	68	73	71	53	88	78	A-
Rodney Grimaldi	So.	PG	6	9	0	7	2	1	19	11	16	5	7	8	91	58	68	1	60	3	16	45	56	47	55	80	75	B-
Gregory Grimsley	Fr.	PG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	59	50	1	37	1	7	55	47	26	42	68	49	B-
Charles Heck	Fr.	PG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	39	53	5	44	1	22	62	36	19	35	77	48	B-
Justin Johnson	Fr.	SG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	21	61	22	18	11	10	64	43	55	30	68	44	C
Tracy Wason	Jr.	SF	8	3	-1	1	5	0	4	6	7	9	-3	6	45	77	61	3	68	8	1	19	54	42	43	69	32	C+
Donald Melton	So.	SF	6	7	6	8	0	1	1	6	5	2	1	1	44	63	40	37	65	13	10	19	29	32	64	62	68	B
Edward Shepard	Jr.	PF	2	3	8	4	3	1	0	0	3	8	6	13	51	55	37	69	52	39	65	1	8	26	38	74	57	C+
James Ricketts	Fr.	PF	8	5	5	4	8	0	0	-2	0	1	4	0	33	58	41	45	59	32	38	19	13	15	52	66	41	D+
George Elser	Sr.	C	4	1	5	1	2	1	0	0	0	4	6	1	25	23	21	91	19	79	84	8	8	36	41	72	58	C+
Leonard Hannah	Jr.	C	2	-1	7	4	12	9	0	2	0	7	4	0	46	28	9	99	39	92	47	1	13	23	79	74	28	B
Tony Deaton	Fr.	C	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	39	12	66	40	63	27	1	6	1	65	57	31	C-

8-10, RPI 77.  Another year, another run at the PIT.  Every year, it seems Koop just needs a couple of W's to sneak into the PIT, only to fall apare in the 2nd half of the conference season.  In all honesty, this is a slightly overperforming squad to date, which is nice since there are only 2 SRs.  Among the returning scholarship players, you have to love Grimaldi's profile and improvement pattern, as well as Hannah (90+ REB and BLK).  RS Ricketts doesn't do enough of any of the big skills for my taste.  The FR have nice starting ratings, but only Deaton's improvements to date really jump out.  No word if the two FR Grimsleys are related.

Mary Washington

			Improvement													Current Status
Name	Yr.	Pos.	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	TOT	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT
James Callaway	So.	PG	0	8	1	8	0	0	4	5	0	10	6	7	60	38	85	2	40	2	1	81	57	64	51	85	36	B
Kenneth Murphy	Fr.	PG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	35	68	1	47	1	15	27	64	49	54	75	17	B-
Michael Carter	Jr.	SG	7	0	11	3	1	-1	3	9	14	8	0	8	63	42	72	31	30	3	1	72	61	70	52	82	71	B+
Antonio Watson	So.	SG	5	15	10	13	4	0	20	8	0	1	16	2	94	55	71	23	55	5	1	44	42	41	80	72	44	B+
Curtis Stone	Jr.	SF	5	1	7	3	4	13	0	0	2	2	6	0	43	43	37	52	49	34	74	2	26	27	35	77	75	B
Michael O'Keefe	So.	SF	13	14	4	3	11	0	0	14	3	9	3	3	77	62	54	40	56	26	2	62	40	24	51	76	26	B+
Karl Jones	Sr.	C	0	0	1	2	-1	0	1	1	2	8	2	1	17	54	23	97	49	71	29	2	20	3	51	72	61	C
Dale Russell	Sr.	C	0	9	1	12	1	2	2	0	0	10	0	6	43	52	13	91	61	81	63	4	1	1	68	88	64	B-
Jimmy Hensley	So.	C	10	1	12	10	3	22	1	0	-1	3	18	16	95	51	19	87	50	69	64	2	1	8	49	72	80	C-
Jimmy Massey	Fr.	C	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	22	16	72	19	69	53	1	15	39	50	66	49	C
Joseph Moses	Fr.	C	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	35	12	73	36	61	47	1	1	1	48	65	45	C-
Charles Mulder	Fr.	C	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	59	12	70	40	55	34	1	14	1	33	74	59	C-

15-3, RPI 8, Ranked #11.  To do this with only 2 JRs and 2 SRs shows how good rusticity is.  Sophomore G Callaway is quite the scorer, on pace to beat Leon Stephens' pretty fresh career scoring mark and has proven he can battle with any of the other big conference G's.  Teamed with the more athletic and PE increasing Watson and ATH/SPD/PE/P green FR Father Murphy, the MW backcourt is set for the next few seasons.  The FR bigs all look promising, with Moses the one most likely to lead MW to the promised land.

Marymount

			Improvement													Current Status
Name	Yr.	Pos.	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	TOT	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT
Larry Becker	Fr.	PG	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	42	58	1	20	1	1	43	48	33	69	72	45	C+
Frank Barnhardt	Jr.	SG	8	8	0	14	0	0	8	6	2	10	3	7	66	70	63	1	69	2	1	82	64	59	44	83	59	C+
Frederick Brown	Jr.	SG	9	6	1	3	3	0	7	12	8	6	3	7	65	65	59	7	41	6	8	73	54	52	72	79	71	A
Alfred Rees	So.	SG	14	9	9	6	9	0	1	15	16	4	-3	0	80	61	49	46	51	32	1	59	55	35	79	75	33	B
Christopher Taormina	So.	SG	3	12	0	12	1	5	6	13	-1	4	8	10	73	52	69	1	47	2	11	42	62	56	51	76	37	B+
Nathan Toomer	Sr.	SF	0	2	6	7	2	3	19	4	3	7	7	0	60	38	48	83	45	56	86	31	36	33	77	80	78	B
Joel Hoerr	Sr.	PF	4	5	3	4	1	5	1	4	0	5	7	0	39	55	43	76	55	43	62	16	15	34	73	94	67	C+
Chad Goodwin	So.	PF	6	5	8	4	9	6	0	0	0	4	0	2	44	61	34	65	54	56	34	1	39	35	24	71	56	C-
Marty Gemmill	Fr.	PF	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	35	28	55	17	31	66	23	22	24	63	58	33	C+
Richard Turcotte	Sr.	C	5	9	5	1	7	9	-1	0	-2	5	-2	0	36	53	35	88	47	82	55	1	11	27	43	66	60	B-
Kenneth Smith	Jr.	C	0	8	14	13	1	14	5	-1	-1	-4	8	2	59	48	31	87	59	56	28	8	1	24	82	75	45	B-
Christopher Leet	Fr.	C	3	2	14	5	5	11	-1	-1	-1	0	6	3	46	47	3	82	34	56	40	2	1	15	49	62	47	C-

16-3, RPI 5, ranked #7.  Kind of a fun team to look over.  In a lot of ratings, it doesn't look so impressive, but as a whole it surpasses the sum of its parts.  Barnhardt/Toomer/Brown score a ton, with Toomer's monster LP making big + D's a problem.  They dominate the boards (with healthy doses of ATH and REB) and don't lose the TO battle too badly despite no P rating over 60.  RS FR Leet sticks out for his low SPD (up from 1) when the 2nd lowest is 25 points higher.  That one is Marty "Pasta" Gemmill who looks high in SPD, REB and LP.  His offseason improvements will be the key to him getting to NT levels of REB.  The last FR, Larry Becker (played by Ted Danson), is a generic pass first PG who perhaps will score in the new engine with an ATH slightly better than most of his ilk.