I strongly suspect both used PEDs, but I guess I'm just from that old school "innocent until proven guilty" philosophy. I don't like Bonds, so it's not like I'm trying rationalize either. Neither he nor Clemens has been conclusively proven to have used PEDs, despite what the circumstantial evidence suggests. With Clemens, enough evidence and witnesses have come forward that I'm not willing to give him the same benefit I give Bonds. Bonds has been the victim of a huge witchhunt like no other player during the PED debacle (and perhaps deservedly so), and yet no one has been able to prove he knowingly took PEDs. Sorry, but that says something. I'd reject him solely on the fact that he's a dick, but objectively, as of what we know this moment, he should be in the hall.