Posted by bad_luck on 2/27/2014 2:27:00 PM (view original):
I would judge the merits of the piece by the piece itself, not necessarily by what else has been written on the site. That article on Jeter was right. Jeter is somewhat overrated. Jeter was not good defensively. Jeter is probably just as selfish as the next superstar athlete.
So yes, tec, I could possibly do that. Yesterday there was a very good piece on tax reform in the usually insane WSJ op/ed pages. That specific column wasn't biased or deserving of dismissal just because it was published in a normally very biased section of a conservative newspaper.
That's what I thought and that's why I posted it. Are any of you so dumb as to think I didn't realize WHERE the piece came from? The point is that, outside of NYC, I think that piece represents the opinions of most baseball fans in regard to Jeter. I think it was a pretty solid summation, regardless of the supposed "bias" of the source.