Mike Trout Topic

bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 4:02:00 PM (view original):
Real player A struck out 133 times in Season X.
He struck out 113 times the next season. 

Was he more productive in the second season?

Yes or no.
You never answered this.
11/5/2015 10:14 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 153 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 11/5/2015 10:07:00 PM (view original):
LOL.

Nice try, moron. 

You stumbled and bumbled for 5 pages avoiding answering a straightforward question, because you knew that answering it would make you look like an idiot.

Guess what . . . DOING THAT made you look like an idiot.

Well done.

I answered your question 87 times.
Actually, you still haven't answered my question at all.
11/5/2015 10:17 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 6:15:00 PM (view original):
What the **** are you even talking about?

Are you saying that the hitters are trading outs for hits in your hypothetical? Then yes. ****. YES. They are better off trading outs for hits.

I guess I am confused that you spent...****...4 pages on this.

NO ONE HAS EVER CLAIMED THAT STRIKEOUTS ARE THE SAME AS BALLS IN PLAY, YOU ******* RETARD.

Yes, I did. Here is one example.
11/5/2015 10:19 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 153 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 4:02:00 PM (view original):
Real player A struck out 133 times in Season X.
He struck out 113 times the next season. 

Was he more productive in the second season?

Yes or no.
You never answered this.
Because I'm not interested is a stupid cherry picking example.

If you're going to argue that a hitter reducing his strikeouts will also reduce his productivity in general, please go ahead and build your case.  I'll check back tomorrow to see how it's going.

11/5/2015 10:19 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
I'm not saying that.

I'm saying that an out is an out.
11/5/2015 10:20 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 153 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 6:15:00 PM (view original):
What the **** are you even talking about?

Are you saying that the hitters are trading outs for hits in your hypothetical? Then yes. ****. YES. They are better off trading outs for hits.

I guess I am confused that you spent...****...4 pages on this.

NO ONE HAS EVER CLAIMED THAT STRIKEOUTS ARE THE SAME AS BALLS IN PLAY, YOU ******* RETARD.

Yes, I did. Here is one example.
That did not answer my question.  There was nothing about "trading outs for hits" in my question.

My question was about reducing strikeouts and putting more balls in play.

11/5/2015 10:21 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 153 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:20:00 PM (view original):
I'm not saying that.

I'm saying that an out is an out.
Yeah.  That's retarded.  And wrong.
11/5/2015 10:21 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by tecwrg on 11/5/2015 10:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:20:00 PM (view original):
I'm not saying that.

I'm saying that an out is an out.
Yeah.  That's retarded.  And wrong.
What's wrong about it?
11/5/2015 10:25 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by tecwrg on 11/5/2015 10:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 6:15:00 PM (view original):
What the **** are you even talking about?

Are you saying that the hitters are trading outs for hits in your hypothetical? Then yes. ****. YES. They are better off trading outs for hits.

I guess I am confused that you spent...****...4 pages on this.

NO ONE HAS EVER CLAIMED THAT STRIKEOUTS ARE THE SAME AS BALLS IN PLAY, YOU ******* RETARD.

Yes, I did. Here is one example.
That did not answer my question.  There was nothing about "trading outs for hits" in my question.

My question was about reducing strikeouts and putting more balls in play.

You're asking me if hitters are better off trading outs for balls in play?

11/5/2015 10:26 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 153 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:25:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 11/5/2015 10:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:20:00 PM (view original):
I'm not saying that.

I'm saying that an out is an out.
Yeah.  That's retarded.  And wrong.
What's wrong about it?
LOL.
11/5/2015 10:26 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
When I say, "an out is an out," does your retarded brain see it as, "a strikeout is the same as a ball in play?"
11/5/2015 10:27 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 153 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 11/5/2015 10:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 6:15:00 PM (view original):
What the **** are you even talking about?

Are you saying that the hitters are trading outs for hits in your hypothetical? Then yes. ****. YES. They are better off trading outs for hits.

I guess I am confused that you spent...****...4 pages on this.

NO ONE HAS EVER CLAIMED THAT STRIKEOUTS ARE THE SAME AS BALLS IN PLAY, YOU ******* RETARD.

Yes, I did. Here is one example.
That did not answer my question.  There was nothing about "trading outs for hits" in my question.

My question was about reducing strikeouts and putting more balls in play.

You're asking me if hitters are better off trading outs for balls in play?

Is that what you think the question is?
11/5/2015 10:28 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18995 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 153 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:27:00 PM (view original):
When I say, "an out is an out," does your retarded brain see it as, "a strikeout is the same as a ball in play?"
Those are both equally retarded statements.  But no.  That's not what I see.

Is that what you see?

11/5/2015 10:29 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
You tell me
11/5/2015 10:29 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by tecwrg on 11/5/2015 10:29:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/5/2015 10:27:00 PM (view original):
When I say, "an out is an out," does your retarded brain see it as, "a strikeout is the same as a ball in play?"
Those are both equally retarded statements.  But no.  That's not what I see.

Is that what you see?

You understand that "an out is an out" does not equal "a strikeout is the same as a ball in play," right?
11/5/2015 10:30 PM
◂ Prev 1...60|61|62|63|64|65 Next ▸
Mike Trout Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.