Sure.  But one of us insists that Rodgers and Brees are way better than Brady.

And that's dumb.

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/22/2014 10:28:00 AM (view original):
Find them for me.   Find someone, anyone, who'll say "Oh, yeah, Rodgers and Brees are way better than Brady."     Then ask them their favorite team.

It's just stupid to say that.  Stupid.

I think a better question you should ask...."What team do you hate the most?"

Posted by tecwrg on 1/22/2014 10:37:00 AM (view original):
Can we all agree that Rodgers, Brees and Brady are all very successful QB's within their team's systems?

Every QB is a product of their system.

Is every QB successful within their team's system?

As I said earlier, put Brady on Cleveland.   He's probably out of the league by now.   Put him in Indy and he backed up Manning for 4 seasons then hoped he could find someone who'd give a former 6th round pick who never played a chance.    So much of a player's career depends on where he landed.

Posted by 05nomar05 on 1/22/2014 11:06:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/22/2014 10:28:00 AM (view original):
Find them for me.   Find someone, anyone, who'll say "Oh, yeah, Rodgers and Brees are way better than Brady."     Then ask them their favorite team.

It's just stupid to say that.  Stupid.

I think a better question you should ask...."What team do you hate the most?"

I'm a bear fan, so I'd love to say Rodgers sucks, but I live in the real world. The pats don't even make the radar for me. It's not personal. I'm just objective enough to call it as it is.

Not really.  Not if you're standing by "Brady is nowhere near as good as Brees/Rodgers".

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/22/2014 11:28:00 AM (view original):
Not really.  Not if you're standing by "Brady is nowhere near as good as Brees/Rodgers".

I'm standing by the stats that agree with me...you know, all of them.

Silliness.

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/22/2014 1:09:00 PM (view original):
Silliness.

Well, the facts disagree with your assessment, but that's never stopped you before and I don't expect it to stop you now either.

What facts?  Your silly posts?    Which "stat" are you looking at that says Rodgers/Brees are head and shoulders above Brady?

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/22/2014 2:00:00 PM (view original):
What facts?  Your silly posts?    Which "stat" are you looking at that says Rodgers/Brees are head and shoulders above Brady?

My "silly" posts got your panties in such a bunch because you were dead wrong on your claim that Brees was mediocre in SD supporting your Brady claims that you're now on a vendetta to win any possible claim that you can.  You don't do well with your pants down.

You've yet to post anything to back up your dumbassery.     Just "The stats prove you wrong" without the actual stats.    The time you did post them, you proved yourself wrong.    Are you stoned or stupid?

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/22/2014 3:55:00 PM (view original):
You've yet to post anything to back up your dumbassery.     Just "The stats prove you wrong" without the actual stats.    The time you did post them, you proved yourself wrong.    Are you stoned or stupid?

You're mad I proved you wrong and you're trying to get me.  Just man up and admit it.

Now I've got you twice.

Well, he has said it more than once now Mike, so I guess it must be true.