Posted by juskay on 4/20/2012 8:40:00 PM (view original):
Hey a$$wipe, I am not crying about the hit. I am commenting on what a cheap shot elbow it was. It was not retaliation??? Retaliation for what??? Missing a check?? You HAWK scum fans are all the same, fine if your player does it, but anyone who touches your player is a bad guy.
Answer this: Which hit was worse?
1)Keith on Daniel or
2)Torres on Hossa?
Since the Torres hit was very very close to being legal, you have to say the cheap shot ELBOW to the HEAD delivered by Keith on Daniel was WWWWAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYY worse. You and your Mudboner should answer the question??????
You've been crying about it for two-three weeks. Sedin tried to cheap shot Keith and missed, Keith got him back. Of course Canuck fans don't see it that way, they have no idea what the reality of the situation is, they've been blinded by the chippy play of their players for so long, they have a martyr complex, think that the NHL is out to get them.
Tell you what, when your team wins a Cup you can talk all the **** you want, in the meantime go back to your Canuck thread and pretend that you actually know something about hockey along with the rest of your fellow candy-assed fans.
You guys give hockey fans a bad name.
I'll answer the question, the Keith hit on the Sedin sister may have been out of line but the Torres hit was borderline criminal, when you decide to accept that fact, we'll talk hockey.